Game theory in communications: motivation, explanation, and application to power control

By Allen B. Mackenzie, Stephen B. Wicker. GLOBECOM'01. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (Cat. No.01CH37270), 2001

352 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f34782b32522a0ed26fde23dafeb7b56b11a48d4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

1. H. Vincent Poor
2. Farhad Meshkati
3. Stuart C. Schwartz
4. Mung Chiang
5. Luiz A. DaSilva
6. Li-Minn Ang
7. Narayan B. Mandayam
8. Allen B. Mackenzie

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. H. Vincent Poor
2. Farhad Meshkati
3. Stuart C. Schwartz
4. Mung Chiang
5. Li-Minn Ang
6. Narayan B. Mandayam
7. Luiz A. DaSilva
8. Allen B. Mackenzie

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Mung Chiang
2. H. Vincent Poor
3. Luiz A. DaSilva
4. Allen B. Mackenzie

Citations in the corpus

• A game-theoretic approach to energy-efficient power control in multicarrier CDMA systems (2005, background): “Hence, power control plays an even more crucial role in such systems.”
• An energy-efficient approach to power control and receiver design in wireless data networks (2005, background): “In [1], the authors provide motivations for using game theory to study communication systems, and, in particular, power control.”
• Classical and swarm intelligence based routing protocols for wireless sensor networks: A survey and comparison (2012, background): “A noted difference between biological and engineered networks is that the former have an evolutionary incentive to cooperate, while engineered networks may require alternative solutions to force nodes to cooperate (Buttyan and Hubaux, 2000; MacKenzie and Wicker, 2001).”
• Game Theory for Wireless Engineers (2006, background): “MacKenzie and Wicker [45] have considered such a game, where cooperating users select a power level that ensures fair operation of the network.”