The Polluter Pays Principle and Cost-Benefit Analysis of Climate Change: An Application of Fund

117 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The economic impact of substantial sea-level rise (2010, methodology): “…was up to 2-m per century, while the costs of sea-level rise increase due to greater damage and protection costs, an optimum response in a benefit-cost sense remains widespread protection of developed coastal areas, as identified in earlier analyses (Nicholls and Tol, 2006, Nicholls et al., 2008).”
Sharing the burden of financing adaptation to climate change (2009, unknown): “’’ Attempts to apply this principle to climate change have been limited to assigning property rights to GHG emissions (as in emissions trading), but generally ignore the question of historical responsibility for climate change (Tol and Verheyen, 2004; Tol, 2006), with a few exceptions.”
On International Equity Weights and National Decision Making on Climate Change (2010, methodology): “Following Tol (2006b), they were adjusted for PPP.”
The Social Cost of Carbon: Trends, Outliers and Catastrophes (2008, unknown): “This paper presents a meta-analysis of over 200 estimates of the SCC, and tests three hypotheses: • The Stern Review is an outlier in the literature (Tol 2006).”