Clustering with Bregman Divergences
By Arindam Banerjee, Srujana Merugu, Inderjit S. Dhillon, Joydeep Ghosh. 2005
1,940 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Statistics and Probability, Algorithms & Complexity
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Sergey Levine
- Yoshua Bengio
- Dacheng Tao
- Quoc V. Le
- Percy Liang
- Mohit Bansal
- Qiang Yang
- Ruslan Salakhutdinov
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Dacheng Tao
- Luc Van Gool
- Trevor Darrell
- Ming-Hsuan Yang
- Xiaogang Wang
- Jitendra Malik
- Yi Yang
- Bernt Schiele
In Statistics and Probability
- Francis R. Bach
- Masashi Sugiyama
- Frank Nielsen
- Qiang Yang
- Joydeep Ghosh
- Inderjit S. Dhillon
- Mehryar Mohri
- Ananda Theertha Suresh
In Algorithms & Complexity
- Frank Nielsen
- Raymond J. Mooney
- Zhi-Hua Zhou
- Cynthia Rudin
- Joydeep Ghosh
- Xindong Wu
- Qiang Yang
- Andrew Béla Frigyik
Citations in the corpus
- Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learning (2017, methodology): “For a particular class of distance functions, known as regular Bregman divergences [4], the Prototypical Networks algorithm is equivalent to performing mixture density estimation on the support set with an exponential family density.”
- Three Approaches for Personalization with Applications to Federated Learning (2020, methodology): “If there are no meta-features, a natural approach is to cluster using a Bregman divergence defined over the distributions D k (Banerjee et al., 2005).”
- Adaptive Gradient-Based Meta-Learning Methods (2019, background): “An everywhere sub-differentiable function f : Finally, we will also consider functions that are exp-concave [29]: We now turn to the Bregman divergence and a discussion of several useful properties [10, 6]: Definition A.4.”
- Agnostic Federated Learning (2019, methodology): “Thus, techniques such as those of Banerjee, Merugu, Dhillon, and Ghosh (2005) could be used to determine clusters of clients using a suitable Bregman divergence.”
- Continual Prototype Evolution: Learning Online from Non-Stationary Data Streams (2020, background): “This assumption is optimal for Bregman divergences for which the cluster mean is shown to have minimal distance to its population [5].”
- Reward Augmented Maximum Likelihood for Neural Structured Prediction (2016, background): “A Bregman divergence is defined by a strictly convex, differentiable, closed potential function F : F → R [3].”
- The Utility of Sparse Representations for Control in Reinforcement Learning (2018, background): “For exponential families, the KL divergence correspond to a Bregman divergence (Banerjee et al. 2005): for a convex potential function F that depends on the exponential family.”
- Learning with Submodular Functions: A Convex Optimization Perspective (2011, neutral): “(wt−1). We denote by DΨ the Bregman divergence associated with the strongly convex function Ψ, i.e., DΨ(v,w) = Ψ(v) − Ψ(w) − (v− w)⊤Ψ′(w). See Figure 7.3 for an illustration and further properties in [14]. The previous iteration may be seen as the one of minimizing with respect to wa certain functio”
- Simplifying Mixture Models Through Function Approximation (2006, background): “The comparison of the time consumptions can be found in Section V-C.”
- Resolving conflicts in heterogeneous data by truth discovery and source reliability estimation (2014, methodology): “An example of a family of convex loss functions is Bregman divergence [1], which includes a variety of loss functions such as squared loss, logistic loss, ItakuraSaito distance, squared Euclidean distance, Mahalanobis distance, KL-divergence and generalized I-divergence.”
- Bregman Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (2013, methodology): “More details about Bregman divergence can be found in [6, 1].”
- A classification for community discovery methods in complex networks (2011, neutral): “However, the framework is presented here because it is possible to apply its principles to all the other community discovery algorithms presented in this survey.”
- A Unified and General Framework for Continual Learning (2024, methodology): “The Bregman divergence (Banerjee et al., 2005) related to Φ for two points p and q within the set Ω can be understood as the discrepancy between the Φ value at point p and the value obtained by approximating Φ using first-order Taylor expansion at q .”
- Curvilinear component analysis and Bregman divergences (2010, background): “A Bregman divergence [1] between two points, p and q ∈ S, is defined to be dF (p,q) = F (p)− F (q)− 〈(p− q),∇F (q)〉 (6) where the angled brackets indicate an inner product and ∇F (q) is the derivative of F evaluated at q.”
- TapNet: Multivariate Time Series Classification with Attentional Prototypical Network (2020, background): “The distance function can be chosen from regular Bregman divergences (Banerjee et al. 2005).”
- Relational learning via collective matrix factorization (2008, background): “Our primary focus is on decomposable regular Bregman divergences [6], which correspond to maximum likelihood in exponential families:”
- Hypothesis Testing, Information Divergence and Computational Geometry (2013, background): “Those dual coordinate systems are related by the Legendre transformation [6] F ∗(η) = supθ∈Θ θ >η−F (θ).”