Modelling the benefits of farmland restoration: methodology and application to butterfly movement

By Odette L. Sutcliffe, Vegar Bakkestuen, G. Fry, O. Stabbetorp. 2003

103 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f30e576a43b72c37da5875b7a06c3bd968bc5cdc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Forks in the Road: Choices in Procedures for Designing Wildland Linkages (2008, background): “Sutcliffe et al. (2003) addressed this problem by starting with a handful of likely vectors derived from ecological knowledge of the focal species and determining which of these vectors was most consistent with observed rates of interpatch movement.”
Landscape connectivity and animal behavior: functional grain as a key determinant for dispersal (2007, unknown): “Unfortunately costs are most often estimated by the best values fitting empirical data to the least cost model (e.g., Sutcliffe et al. 2003), or even more indirectly by using expert opinion (e.g., Verbeylen et al. 2003).”
MATRIX STRUCTURE OBSCURES THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTERPATCH MOVEMENT AND PATCH SIZE AND ISOLATION (2005, background): “Unfortunately, there is no ‘‘easy fix’’ because accounting for the effects of matrix structure on interpatch movement adds considerable complexity to a model (e.g., Ferreras 2001, Goodwin and Fahrig 2002b, James et al. 2002, Sutcliffe et al. 2003, Gardner and Gustafson 2004).”
Amphibian decline, pond loss and reduced population connectivity under agricultural intensification over a 38 year period (2017, background): “Practical nature conservation has often been focussed on enhancing key breeding sites, but there is increasing awareness of the need for protection and restoration of habitat corridors and other components in the environment that promote dispersal (Sutcliffe et al. 2003; McRae et al. 2012).”
Optimizing dispersal and corridor models using landscape genetics (2007, unknown): “2003) and 'friction' analyses (Ray, Lehmann & Joly 2002; Joly, Morand & Cohas 2003; Sutcliffe et al. 2003; Nikolakaki 2004).”
Estimating landscape resistance to movement: a review (2012, methodology): “This approach was combined with detection data (Janin et al. 2009), relocation data (Sutcliffe et al. 2003), pathway data (Cushman and Lewis 2010) and genetic data (Cushman et al. 2006) in the second stage to select the best surface.”
Habitat models and habitat connectivity analysis for butterflies and burnet moths - The example of Zygaena carniolica and Coenonympha arcania (2005, background): “diversity in large parts of Europe (Petit et al., 2003; BFN, 2003; Sutcliffe et al., 2003).”
The re-expansion and improving status of the silver-spotted skipper butterfly (Hesperia comma) in Britain: a metapopulation success story (2005, background): “To assist the movement of species through the wider countryside, mosaics of suitable habitat need to be managed (Roland et al., 2000; Ricketts, 2001; Hill et al., 2001; Sutcliffe et al., 2003), either by conservation agencies or under agri-environment schemes.”
The influences of landscape structure on butterfly distribution and movement: a review (2009, methodology): “Sutcliffe et al. (2003) used least-cost modelling to compare Euclidean distance and least-cost pathways as explanatory variables in dispersal using the movements of Lycaena virgaureae and Aphantopus hyperantus between habitat patches in an arable dominated landscape in Norway.”
Non‐optimal animal movement in human‐altered landscapes (2007, unknown): “Thomas, Hill & Lewis (1998) found similar results for a butterfly; relative allocation of mass to the thorax (as compared to the abdomen) increased with decreasing habitat amount, indicating higher flight capacity in landscapes containing less habitat.”
Targeting and evaluating biodiversity conservation action within fragmented landscapes: an approach based on generic focal species and least-cost networks (2010, methodology): “The permeability score of each matrix land cover type was used to define the effective or least-cost distance a species can potentially move through the matrix (Adriaensen et al. 2003; Chardon et al. 2003; Sutcliffe et al. 2003).”