System of cyanoprokaryotes (cyanobacteria) state in 2004

By Lucien Hoffmann, J. Komárek, Jan Kaštovský. 2005

237 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Environmental Chemistry, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f3049fa005300c5149e22f093d31fec89b22d3fc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. J. Komárek
2. B. Whitton
3. Malcolm Potts
4. L. Naselli-Flores
5. R. Barone

In Environmental Chemistry

1. J. Komárek
2. B. Whitton
3. Malcolm Potts
4. D. Casamatta
5. Hans W. Paerl
6. R. Barone
7. L. Naselli-Flores

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

1. J. Komárek
2. Lucien Hoffmann
3. D. Casamatta

Citations in the corpus

• Introduction to the Cyanobacteria (2012, background): “Hoffmann et al. ( 2005 ) stressed that the taxonomic system needed to be continually revized and updated, but that system is essentially a continuation of the traditional system.”
• Species concepts and speciation factors in cyanobacteria, with connection to the problems of diversity and classification (2015, background): “Hoffmann et al. (2005) proposed a new system of classification where members of the Chroococcales and Oscillatoriales formed two subclasses, the Synechococcophycideae and the Oscillar-iophycidae.”
• MORPHOLOGICAL AND MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION OF PLANKTONIC CYANOBACTERIA FROM BELGIUM AND LUXEMBOURG 1 (2006, background): “…the phylogenetic relationships do not follow the current taxonomic classifications of Komárek and Anagnostidis (1986, 1989), Anagnostidis and Komárek (1985, 1988), or Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology (Castenholz 2001), thus calling for a new classification system (Hoffmann et al. 2005).”
• Nomenclatural validation of the genetically revised cyanobacterial genus Dolichospermum (RALFS ex BORNET et FLAHAULT) comb. nova. (2009, background): “The genetic difference between planktic and typical mat-forming Anabaena-morphotypes is so distinct that both these clusters must be classified in modern cyanoprocaryotic system as separate genera (GuGGer et al. 2002b, Hoffmann et al. 2005, rajaniemi et al. 2005a,b, Willame et al. 2006).”
• Cyanobacterial Taxonomy: Current Problems and Prospects for the Integration of Traditional and Molecular Approaches (2006, background): “These are characterized solely by thylakoidal arrangement, with each line comprising both coccoid and filamentous, non-heterocytous genera (Komárek and Kaštovský 2003; Hoffmann et al. 2005a) (Fig.”