Comparison of the device physics principles of planar and radial p-n junction nanorod solar cells

By B. Kayes, Harry A. Atwater, Nathan S. Lewis. 2005

1,321 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f2fe877c4ec3ac66c7dfd46335e676861b7fd608

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

1. Magnus Borgström
2. J. Wallentin
3. Mark L. Brongersma
4. Nathan S. Lewis
5. Lars Samuelson
6. Zhiyong Fan
7. Yi Cui
8. Ali Javey

In Biomedical Engineering

1. Magnus Borgström
2. J. Wallentin
3. Lars Samuelson
4. Mark L. Brongersma
5. Harry A. Atwater
6. Yi Cui
7. E. Warren
8. Nathan S. Lewis

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. Magnus Borgström
2. Nathan S. Lewis
3. Yi Cui
4. J. Wallentin
5. Lars Samuelson
6. Harry A. Atwater
7. Mark L. Brongersma
8. E. Warren

Citations in the corpus

• Challenges and prospects of nanopillar-based solar cells (2009, background): “Yet, absorption and collection are in competition in thin film devices [39] [40].”
• Nanowires With Promise for Photovoltaics (2011, background): “diffusion length of photogenerated carriers [11].”
• Si microwire-array solar cells (2010, background): “These efficiencies, in combination with the ability to grow arrays of Si microwires over large areas (> 1 cm(2)),[27] to peel the wire arrays from the growth substrate in a flexible polymer,[14] and to re-use the growth substrate,[32] indicate that the fabrication of flexible, high efficiency c-Si s”