THEROPOD TEETH FROM THE PRINCE CREEK FORMATION (CRETACEOUS) OF NORTHERN ALASKA, WITH SPECULATIONS ON ARCTIC DINOSAUR PALEOECOLOGY

By A. Fiorillo, R. Gangloff. 2001

103 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Proposed Terminology of Theropod Teeth (Dinosauria, Saurischia) (2015, unknown): “…and some Upper Cretaceous theropods of Northern America (e.g., Currie, 1987; Currie et al., 1990; Fiorillo and Currie, 1994; Baszio, 1997; Fiorillo and Gangloff, 2001; Sankey et al., 2002; Smith, 2005, 2007; Fanti and Therrien, 2007; Brinkman, 2008; Longrich, 2008; Sankey, 2008; Buckley,…”
A Review of Dromaeosaurid Systematics and Paravian Phylogeny (2012, background): “DISCUSSION: Saurornitholestes langstoni has been reported from the Oldman Formation, Alberta (Sues, 1978), the Judith River Formation, Montana (Russell, 1969), Dinosaur Park Formation, Alberta (Currie, 2005), Kirtland Formation, New Mexico (Sullivan and Lucas, 2000), the Aguja Formation, Texas (Sank”
Body Size Overlap, Habitat Partitioning and Living Space Requirements of Terrestrial Vertebrate Predators: Implications for the Paleoecology of Large Theropod Dinosaurs (2002, background): “On the basis of theropod tooth assemblages, Fiorillo and Gangloff (2000) speculated that Troodon formosus may have been less characteristic of the Dinosaur Park region than of areas further to the north.”
SMALL THEROPOD AND BIRD TEETH FROM THE LATE CRETACEOUS (LATE CAMPANIAN) JUDITH RIVER GROUP, ALBERTA (2002, unknown): “A were not reported in assemblages in Alaska, where Troodon teeth are abundant (Fiorillo and Gangloff, 2000).”