Learning person-object interactions for action recognition in still images
By Vincent Delaitre, Josef Sivic, Ivan Laptev. 2011
158 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Luc Van Gool
- Cordelia Schmid
- Jitendra Malik
- Andrew Zisserman
- Kristen Grauman
- Li Fei-Fei
- Dacheng Tao
- Trevor Darrell
Citations in the corpus
- Joint Discovery of Object States and Manipulation Actions (2017, background): “Modeling co-occurrences of objects and actions have shown benefits for recognizing actions in [11, 19, 26, 35, 47].”
- Weakly-Supervised Learning of Visual Relations (2017, background): “This task was studied for the special case of human-object interactions [8, 9, 17, 38, 39, 48, 49, 50], where the triplet is in the form ( person, action, object ) .”
- Anticipating Human Activities Using Object Affordances for Reactive Robotic Response (2013, background): “Another approach is to represent activities as collections of semantic attributes [18], [19], [20], [21].”
- Learning to Track for Spatio-Temporal Action Localization (2015, neutral): “Action recognition and localization in still images [3] is an extreme example along the first line, where local detectors are trained e.”
- HICO: A Benchmark for Recognizing Human-Object Interactions in Images (2015, background): “detecting human body parts) by deriving feature representations based on human poses [11, 38, 21, 30, 32, 31], whereas others focus more on spatial relations between humans and objects [34, 33, 23, 9, 5, 4].”
- On Recognizing Actions in Still Images via Multiple Features (2012, background): “Object-person interactions are explored in other works such as [2, 3, 13, 14].”
- Learning Human-Object Interactions by Graph Parsing Neural Networks (2018, methodology): “Early work in HOI understanding studied Bayesian model [15, 16], utilized contextual relationship between human and objects [47–49], learned structured representations with spatial interaction and context [8], exploited compositional models [9], or referred to a set of HOI exemplars [19].”
- A survey on still image based human action recognition (2014, methodology): “In their later methods [30,38], the model was extended to deal with any number of objects, instead of being limited to the interactions between one person and one object.”
- Attentional Pooling for Action Recognition (2017, background): “Pose: There have also been previous works in incorporating human pose into action recognition [8, 10, 60].”
- Joint action recognition and pose estimation from video (2015, background): “For certain actions defined by specific geometric configuration of body parts, pose estimation from a single image may be sufficient for action recognition [15, 28, 5, 32].”
- First Person Action-Object Detection with EgoNet (2016, background): “n pose and objects for activity recognition. Some approaches also used low level bag-offeature models to learn the spatial relationship between objects and activities from a single third-person image [10]. Conversely, the activity can provide a functional cue to recognize objects [48, 14, 24]. Such ”
- “Important stuff, everywhere!” Activity recognition with salient proto-objects as context (2014, background): “Approaches that solely use image features to automatically retrieve object information mostly rely on trained detectors [16, 11, 35, 25, 27, 6].”
- Learning to Detect Human-Object Interactions (2017, methodology): “Results produced in these works were evaluated on either action classification [34, 33, 6, 25, 4, 5, 28, 13], object detection [34], or human pose estimation [34, 5]; none of them were directly evaluated on HOI detection.”
- Watching Unlabeled Video Helps Learn New Human Actions from Very Few Labeled Snapshots (2013, methodology): “In particular, “poselets” [4]—local part-based features mined for their consistency with fragments of body pose—have proven to be a promising representation [33, 17, 7], as well as high-level descriptors that also incorporate interactions with objects [8, 34, 7, 36].”
- Representing Videos Using Mid-level Discriminative Patches (2013, background): “Furthermore, these patches can be used as a discriminative vocabulary for action classification where they demonstrate stateof-the-art performance on UCF50 and Olympics datasets.”
- Action Recognition with Exemplar Based 2.5D Graph Matching (2012, background): “The idea of using human poses for action recognition has been studied in some previous work which either detect local pose features [4, 6] or model the spatial configuration between human body parts and objects [2, 3, 7, 8].”
- A similarity measure for analyzing human activities using human-object interaction context (2014, methodology): “OVERVIEW OF EXISTING METHODS Recently, human-object interaction cues have received a lot of attention when designing systems for understanding human actions in a still image [5, 8-10].”