Spatial structure in ecological communities – a quantitative analysis

93 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Integrating dispersal proxies in ecological and environmental research in the freshwater realm (2017, background): “For example, Soininen (2014; 2016) found a total of 322 data 419 sets, which were analyzed with variation partitioning methods (most of which were from 420 lakes and streams).”
Disentangling good from bad practices in the selection of spatial or phylogenetic eigenvectors (2018, background): “These methodological biases are likely to have caused false positives and/or overfitted signals (mostly in the pure spatial fraction of VP), and these may impact meta-analyses (Soininen 2016, for a meta-analysis of the degree of spatial structure across different types of organisms and ecosystems).”
Effects of dispersal mode on the environmental and spatial correlates of nestedness and species turnover in pond communities (2017, background): “While metacommunities have received considerable theoretical consideration in recent years (Logue et al. 2011, Heino 2013b, Meynard et al. 2013, Soininen 2016), there has been an empirical focus on community assembly and overall beta diversity, with few attempts to examine the local and spatial…”