Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for direct visualization of microorganisms.

By A. Moter, U. Göbel. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 2000

796 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f29dc3870430f8dff5003359bc46228473b7034a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Molecular Biology

Citations in the corpus

Oral Biofilm Architecture on Natural Teeth (2010, background): “This reflects differences in physiological activity of the cells [23].”
Culture-independent molecular tools for soil and rhizosphere microbiology (2013, background): “FISH -Allows detection and spatial distribution of more than one samples at the same time -Autofluorescence of microorganisms -Accuracy and reliability is highly dependent on specificity of probe(s) [57]”
New Approaches for Bioaugmentation as a Remediation Technology (2004, background): “8 , 151 , 166 , 179 , 252 , 260 Cells are hybridized with a probe that is tagged with a fluorescent molecule thus enabling microscopic detection.”
Soil health: a new challenge for microbiologists and chemists (2005, background): “While this technique allows selective visualization of bacterial cells of different phylogenetic groups, it also has some limitations, particularly regarding quantitative analysis of complex samples [44].”
Current and Prospective Methods for Plant Disease Detection (2015, background): “In addition to the detection of culturable microorganisms that cause the plant diseases, FISH could also be used to detect yet-to-be cultured (so called unculturable) organisms in order to investigate complex microbial communities [24].”
Role of the Biofilms in Wastewater Treatment (2016, methodology): “FISH-based methods have revolu‐ tionized investigations into the morphology and microbial composition of biofilms and enable bacteria to be mapped [58].”