An improved criterion for new particle formation in diverse atmospheric environments

By C. Kuang, I. Riipinen, S. Sihto, Markku Kulmala, A. Mccormick, P. Mcmurry. 2010

162 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract. A dimensionless theory for new particle formation (NPF) was developed, using an aerosol population balance model incorporating recent developments in nucleation rates and measured particle growth rates. Based on this theoretical analysis, it was shown that a dimensionless parameter LΓ, characterizing the ratio of the particle scavenging loss rate to the particle growth rate, exclusively determined whether or not NPF would occur on a particular day. This parameter determines the probability that a nucleated particle will grow to a detectable size before being lost by coagulation with the pre-existing aerosol. Cluster-cluster coagulation was shown to contribute negligibly to this survival probability under conditions pertinent to the atmosphere. Data acquired during intensive measurement campaigns in Tecamac (MILAGRO), Atlanta (ANARChE), Boulder, and Hyytiala (QUEST II, QUEST IV, and EUCAARI) were used to test the validity of LΓ as an NPF criterion. Measurements included aerosol size distributions down to 3 nm and gas-phase sulfuric acid concentrations. The model was applied to seventy-seven NPF events and nineteen non-events (characterized by growth of pre-existing aerosol without NPF) measured in diverse environments with broad ranges in sulfuric acid concentrations, ultrafine number concentrations, aerosol surface areas, and particle growth rates (nearly two orders of magnitude). Across this diverse data set, a nominal value of LΓ=0.7 was found to determine the boundary for the occurrence of NPF, with NPF occurring when LΓ 0.7. Moreover, nearly 45% of measured LΓ values associated with NPF fell in the relatively narrow range of 0.1

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3dc32a3326be94a88098fb6415465b80ce4cb99d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

  1. Markku Kulmala
  2. C. Kuang
  3. P. Mcmurry
  4. V. Kerminen
  5. Tuukka Petäjä
  6. I. Riipinen
  7. T. Anttila
  8. J. Smith

In Global and Planetary Change

  1. Markku Kulmala
  2. V. Kerminen
  3. C. Kuang
  4. P. Mcmurry
  5. Tuukka Petäjä
  6. Tuomo Nieminen
  7. I. Riipinen
  8. Xuemeng Chen

In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

  1. C. Kuang
  2. Markku Kulmala
  3. P. Mcmurry
  4. Tuukka Petäjä
  5. T. Anttila
  6. V. Kerminen
  7. I. Riipinen
  8. J. Smith

Citations in the corpus