Planning of renewables schemes: Deliberative and fair decision-making on landscape issues instead of reproachful accusations of non-cooperation

By M. Wolsink. 2007

674 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f292f8edd529842dfd92700e674ffc6bca84cea4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Explaining “NIMBY” Objections to a Power Line (2013, background): “That the power line may have been perceived to “urbanise” the rural character of the place echoes previous research on wind turbines in which local objections were based on the visual impacts of technologies (Wolsink, 2007), for example, being characterized as “industrial” and contrasted with the pe”
Does Green Consumerism Increase the Acceptance of Wind Power (2012, background): “To achieve this aim, deep knowledge of the sources and contingencies of resistance, as well as of social acceptance and support, is needed (Breukers and Wolsink, 2007; Haggett, 2011; Jobert et al., 2007; van der Horst, 2007).”
A review of land use, visibility and public perception of renewable energy in the context of landscape impact (2020, background): “Landscape is undoubtedly expected to play a significant role [43] in the RE transition, especially in cases where cultural or natural heritage is affected and key”
Acceptance, acceptability and environmental justice: the role of community benefits in wind energy development (2011, background): “This is a critical issue for wind energy, where the landscape and visual impacts greatly influence social responses (Wolsink 2007).”
Understanding community benefit payments from renewable energy development (2017, background): “Characterised by individual and community values rather than normative science, this is a challenging issue for planners (Kerr, 2006; Wolsink, 2007).”
Deliberative Speak at the Turbine Face: Community Engagement, Wind Farms, and Renewable Energy Transitions, in Australia (2008, result): “However, in contrast to that view, and in drawing on the expansive European literature about wind farms (eg, Devine-Wright, 2005 ; Haggett & Toke, 2006 ; Wolsink, 2007 ), Burningham et al.”
A Turbine is not only a Turbine: The Role of Social Context and Fairness Characteristics for the Local Acceptance of Wind Power (2017, methodology): “However, previous studies also suggest a U-shaped pattern of attitudes towards wind power developments over time (Wolsnik 2007a: 1197).”
Contested environmental policy infrastructure: socio-political acceptance of renewable energy, water, and waste facilities (2010, background): “IC building refers to the capacity to facilitate open policy and decision-making processes that provide access to relevant stakeholders and room for various types of knowledge resources (Healey 1998; Breukers and Wolsink, 2007).”