Using quantitative electron microscopy for process mineralogy applications

By P. Gottlieb, G. Wilkie, D. Sutherland, E. Ho-Tun, S. Suthers, K. Perera, B. Jenkins, S. Spencer, A. R. Butcher, J. Rayner. 2000

378 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Particle texture analysis using polarized light imaging and grey level intercepts (2007, background): “Most research teams involved in modal analysis or liberation analysis of ores have adopted the Scanning Electron Microscope as their privileged imaging device (Gottlieb et al., 2000; Petruk, 1998).”
Automated mineralogy and petrology - applications of TESCAN Integrated Mineral Analyzer (TIMA) (2018, methodology): “Automated Mineralogy instruments such as QEMSCAN (Gottlieb et al. 2000) and MLA (Fandrich et al.”
Quantitative compositional mapping of mineral phases by electron probe micro-analyser (2018, methodology): “Applications with other instruments, such as scanning electron microscopes (SEM) equipped with energy-dispersive spectrometers (EDS), are very popular in the mining industry (Gottlieb et al. 2000) and can also been used in a quantitative way (Seddio 2015; Ortolano et al. 2018).”
SEM-Based Automated Mineralogy and Its Application in Geo- and Material Sciences (2020, methodology): “The FieldImage mode allows the quantification of the modal mineralogy but also investigating textures and fabrics of larger samples [25,29,36] By the MLA or Mineral Liberation Analysis software (FEI Company MLA) for each analysis point, a full EDS spectrum is stored during analysis.”