Conditioning, Likelihood, and Coherence: A Review of Some Foundational Concepts
By James M. Robins, Larry A. Wasserman. 2000
67 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f27ced0ca162fe5c765eb3f12232fa1beebe19df
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Christopher C. Holmes
- Sander Greenland
- Edwin Fong
- Stephen G. Walker
- Roderick J. A. Little
- Victoria Savalei
- Catia Scricciolo
- Paul T. von Hippel
In Statistics and Probability
- Christopher C. Holmes
- Sander Greenland
- Stephen G. Walker
- Edwin Fong
- Roderick J. A. Little
- Paul T. von Hippel
- James M. Robins
- Victoria Savalei
Citations in the corpus
- Calibrated Bayes (2006, background): “In a recent discussion of these ideas, Robins and Wasserman (2000) argued for reexamination of the likelihood principle in the context of an infinite-dimensional example described by Robins and Ritov (1997).”
- Martingale posterior distributions (2021, background): “Extensions of coherence to forecasting are given in Lane and Sudderth (1984); Berti et al. (1998), and more examples of coherence in general can be found in Robins and Wasserman (2000); Eaton and Freedman (2004).”
- Valid P-Values Behave Exactly as They Should: Some Misleading Criticisms of P-Values and Their Resolution With S-Values (2019, background): “…ratios to counterfactual data reflects an information loss which can be extreme in high-dimensional problems (where likelihoodbased procedures may provide no consistent inference yet valid P-values can be constructed from the full sampling distribution; see Robins and Wasserman 2000, sec.”