Laser interferometry for the Big Bang Observer

By Gregory M. Harry, P. Fritschel, D. Shaddock, William M. Folkner, E. Phinney. 2006

426 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f27a1f61ed321962ed2d43cb0fcf62c51a08f915

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

1. C. Caprini
2. R. Durrer
3. G. Servant
4. T. Terada
5. K. Kohri
6. Andrii Y. Neronov
7. T. Konstandin
8. Misao Sasaki

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

1. G. Servant
2. R. Durrer
3. K. Kohri
4. T. Terada

Citations in the corpus

• Solar-mass primordial black holes explain NANOGrav hint of gravitational waves (2020, methodology): “Future prospects of various GW observations are also shown: SKA [61], LISA [103], TianQin [104, 105], BBO [106], DECIGO [107], AION [108], AEDGE [109], Advanced LIGO Hanford and Livingston [110] combined with Advanced Virgo [111] as well as LIGO India [112, 113] and KAGRA [114, 115] (HLVIK), and Ein”
• Semianalytic calculation of gravitational wave spectrum nonlinearly induced from primordial curvature perturbations (2018, methodology): “The observations are from SKA [58], eLISA [59], LISA [60], BBO [61], DECIGO [62], Einstein Telescope [63], Cosmic Explorer [64], and KAGRA [65].”
• The stochastic gravitational wave background from turbulence and magnetic fields generated by a first-order phase transition (2009, methodology): “LIGO Corr AGIS LISA BBO BBO Corr 10-4 0.01 1 100 10-27 10-25 10-23 10-21 10-19 f HHzL h Figure 16.”