Industrial Competitiveness Under the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme

By J. Reinaud. 2005

158 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f24ee836779961ea0e4ed7bcbb71358a3a886efe

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

CO2 cost pass-through and windfall profits in the power sector (2006, background): “Companies can either use these allowances to cover the emissions resulting from the production of these installations or sell them to other companies that need additional allowances (Reinaud, 2005).”
EU emissions trading and the cement sector: a spatial competition analysis (2008, methodology): “Reinaud (2005) likewise considers international industrial competitiveness effects primarily in terms of loss of manufacturing output.”
Reflections—The Emerging Literature on Emissions Trading in Europe (2008, background): “As a result, the European Commission commissioned McKinsey and Ecofys (2006), which arrives at conclusions similar to those of Climate Strategies and early work by the International Energy Agency (Reinaud 2005).”
On the empirical content of carbon leakage criteria in the EU emissions trading scheme (2014, background): “…2.1 above.15 Ex ante evaluations have suggested that the EU ETS adversely impacts on production in most regulated industries while rising electricity prices lower the profitability of highly exposed industries such as primary aluminum production (e.g. Demailly and Quirion, 2008; Reinaud, 2005).”
CO 2 price dynamics: The implications of EU emissions trading for the price of electricity (2005, background): “This applies particularly for countries such as Ireland, Italy and Spain (ILEX, 2004; Reinaud, 2004; Doyle 2005).”
Addressing leakage in the EU ETS: Border adjustment or output-based allocation? (2011, unknown): “Production costs based on Reinaud (2005).”