Data-to-Text Generation with Content Selection and Planning
By Ratish Puduppully, Li Dong, Mirella Lapata. 2018
336 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Recent advances in data-to-text generation have led to the use of large-scale datasets and neural network models which are trained end-to-end, without explicitly modeling what to say and in what order. In this work, we present a neural network architecture which incorporates content selection and planning without sacrificing end-to-end training. We decompose the generation task into two stages. Given a corpus of data records (paired with descriptive documents), we first generate a content plan highlighting which information should be mentioned and in which order and then generate the document while taking the content plan into account. Automatic and human-based evaluation experiments show that our model1 outperforms strong baselines improving the state-of-the-art on the recently released RotoWIRE dataset.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Mohit Bansal
- Jianfeng Gao
- Graham Neubig
- Luke S. Zettlemoyer
- Percy Liang
- Caiming Xiong
- Yejin Choi
- Richard Socher
In Natural Language Processing
- Graham Neubig
- Mohit Bansal
- Luke S. Zettlemoyer
- Mirella Lapata
- Percy Liang
- Caiming Xiong
- Jianfeng Gao
- Yejin Choi
Citations in the corpus
- Repairing the Cracked Foundation: A Survey of Obstacles in Evaluation Practices for Generated Text (2022, background): “While separate reasoning steps are starting to be incorporated into current NLG approaches (e.g., Puduppully et al., 2019; 17See Belinkov and Glass (2019) for a recent survey of analysis methods.”
- Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation (2022, methodology): “Planning is a common method to control and restrict what the model generates by informing the content and its order [147].”
- DART: Open-Domain Structured Data Record to Text Generation (2020, neutral): “…models based on attention and copy mechanisms have shown promising results (Wiseman et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2018; Gehrmann et al., 2018; Puduppully et al., 2018, 2019; Iso et al., 2019; Castro Ferreira et al., 2019; Shen et al., 2019; Roberti et al., 2019; Zhu et al., 2019b;…”
- ToTTo: A Controlled Table-To-Text Generation Dataset (2020, methodology): “• Puduppully et al. (2019): A Seq2Seq model with an explicit content selection and planning mechanism designed for data-to-text.”
- Text-to-Text Pre-Training for Data-to-Text Tasks (2020, methodology): “• Content Planner (Puduppully et al., 2019) - A seq2seq model with separate content planning and generation stages.”
- Evaluation of Text Generation: A Survey (2020, neutral): “, 2019b) and data-to-text generation (Reiter, 2007; Lebret et al., 2016a; Sha et al., 2017; Puduppully et al., 2018; Wang, 2019; Nan et al., 2021).”
- Detecting Hallucinated Content in Conditional Neural Sequence Generation (2020, methodology): “Neural sequence models for tasks such as data-to-text generation (Puduppully et al., 2019), machine translation (MT; Vaswani et al. (2017); Wu et al. (2016)) and text summarization (Rothe et al., 2020) can often generate fluent text that is sometimes preferred to human-written content (L¨aubli et…”
- Few-Shot NLG with Pre-Trained Language Model (2019, methodology): “…been used, including the end-to-end methods that jointly model context selection and surface realization (Liu et al. 2018; Wiseman, Shieber, and Rush 2018; Puduppully, Dong, and Lapata 2018), and the methods using neural network to tackle realization component (Moryossef, Goldberg, and Dagan 2019).”
- Constrained Decoding for Neural NLG from Compositional Representations in Task-Oriented Dialogue (2019, background): “Puduppully et al. (2018) builds a modular end-to-end neural architecture that performs content planning in addition to realization, although they focus on generating text from structured tables, and don’t consider discourse structure.”
- Findings of the Fourth Workshop on Neural Generation and Translation (2020, methodology): “We use a two-stage model from (Puduppully et al., 2019) for NLG tracks.”
- Text Generation from Knowledge Graphs with Graph Transformers (2019, background): “Data-totext generation models (Konstas and Lapata, 2013; Lebret et al., 2016; Wiseman et al., 2017; Puduppully et al., 2019) condition text generation on table-structured inputs.”
- A Gold Standard Methodology for Evaluating Accuracy in Data-To-Text Systems (2020, methodology): “With these caveats in mind, Table 2 suggests that Puduppully et al. (2019) and Wiseman et al. (2017) have similar profiles for accuracy errors.”
- A Tree-to-Sequence Model for Neural NLG in Task-Oriented Dialog (2019, background): “Puduppully et al. (2019) add a content planning step where a set of input database records are mapped to an ordered list of selected records; however, their approach does not employ hierarchical content plans as in our approach.”
- Logical Natural Language Generation from Open-Domain Tables (2020, methodology): “As such, existing methods based on surface-level copying (See et al., 2017; Gu et al., 2016; Puduppully et al., 2019a) becomes insufficient, so are the existing fidelity evaluation based on the surface-level information extraction (Wiseman et al., 2017; Rohrbach et al., 2018; Dhingra et al., 2019),…”
- AggGen: Ordering and Aggregating while Generating (2021, background): “Puduppully et al. (2019) include a jointly trained content selection and ordering module that is applied before the main text generation step.”
- Data-to-text Generation with Entity Modeling (2019, methodology): “Various attempts have also been made to improve these models, e.g., by adding content selection (Perez-Beltrachini and Lapata, 2018) and content planning (Puduppully et al., 2019) mechanisms.”
- Controlling hallucinations at word level in data-to-text generation (2021, positive): “The use of Deep Learning based methods to solve DTG tasks has led to sudden improvements in state of the art performances [29, 70, 36, 49].”
- Bridging the Structural Gap Between Encoding and Decoding for Data-To-Text Generation (2020, background): “This suggests a need for an intermediate “planning” stage (Reiter and Dale, 2000; Puduppully et al., 2019) to help with organizing the output.”
- Progressive Generation of Long Text with Pretrained Language Models (2021, methodology): “Recent neural approaches have also adopted similar planning-then-generation strategies for data-to-text (Moryossef et al., 2019; Puduppully et al., 2019), story-telling (Fan et al., 2019; Yao et al., 2019; Xu et al., 2020), machine translation (Ford et al., 2018), and others (Hua and Wang, 2019;…”