A Novel Use of Statistical Parsing to Extract Information from Text
By Scott Miller, Heidi Fox, Lance A. Ramshaw, Ralph M. Weischedel. 2000
237 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Information Extraction
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Information Extraction
- Ralph Grishman
- Ronan Collobert
- Donghong Ji
- Jason Aaron Edward Weston
- Dan Jurafsky
- Satoshi Sekine
- Raymond J. Mooney
- Daniel Gildea
Citations in the corpus
- Natural Language Processing (Almost) from Scratch (2011, background): “Musillo and Merlo (2006) also describe a negative result at the same joint task.”
- Hedge Trimmer: A Parse-and-Trim Approach to Headline Generation (2003, methodology): “Generated Headline: Kurdish guerilla forces poured into Kirkuk after Iraqi troops abandoned oil fields.”
- Head-Driven Statistical Models for Natural Language Parsing (2003, background): “Miller et al. (2000) develop generative, lexicalized models for information extraction of relations.”
- Dependency Tree Kernels for Relation Extraction (2004, methodology): “Miller et al. (2000) propose an integrated statistical parsing technique that augments parse trees with semantic labels denoting entity and relation types.”
- Combining Lexical, Syntactic, and Semantic Features with Maximum Entropy Models for Information Extraction (2004, methodology): “For the Template Relations task of MUC-7, BBN researchers (Miller et al., 2000) augmented syntactic parse trees with semantic information corresponding to entities and relations and built generative models for the augmented trees.”
- Structured Models for Fine-to-Coarse Sentiment Analysis (2007, methodology): “This includes parsing and relation extraction (Miller et al., 2000), entity labeling and relation extraction (Roth and Yih, 2004), and part-of-speech tagging and chunking (Sutton et al., 2004).”
- Joint Parsing and Semantic Role Labeling (2005, background): “For example, Miller et al. (2000) showed that performing parsing and information extraction in a joint model improves performance on both tasks.”
- A Statistical Semantic Parser that Integrates Syntax and Semantics (2005, methodology): “The syntactic model in (Miller et al., 2000) is similar to Collins’, but does not use features like subcat frames and distance measures.”
- Semi-supervised Relation Extraction with Large-scale Word Clustering (2011, methodology): “Then the feature based method explicitly extracts a variety of lexical, syntactic and semantic features for statistical learning, either generative or discriminative (Miller et al., 2000; Kambhatla, 2004; Boschee et al., 2005; Grishman et al., 2005; Zhou et al., 2005; Jiang and Zhai, 2007).”
- Composition of Conditional Random Fields for Transfer Learning (2005, unknown): “Finally, Miller et al. (Miller et al., 2000) have combined entity recognition, parsing, and relation extraction into a jointly-trained single statistical parsing model that achieves improved performance on all the subtasks.”
- A unified architecture for natural language processing: deep neural networks with multitask learning (2008, methodology): “Similarly, in (Miller et al., 2000) NER, parsing and relation extraction were jointly trained in a statistical parsing model achieving improved performance on all tasks.”
- Automatic Labeling of Semantic Roles (2000, methodology): “For example, in the context of the Air Traveler Information System (ATIS) for spoken dialogue, Miller et al. (1996) computed the probability that a constituent such as Atlanta filled a semantic slot such as DESTINATION in a semantic frame for air travel.”
- Relation Extraction Using Label Propagation Based Semi-Supervised Learning (2006, methodology): “Many machine learning methods have been proposed to address this problem, e.g., supervised learning algorithms (Miller et al., 2000; Zelenko et al., 2002; Culotta and Soresen, 2004; Kambhatla, 2004; Zhou et al., 2005), semi-supervised learning algorithms (Brin, 1998; Agichtein and Gravano, 2000;…”
- Extracting Relations with Integrated Information Using Kernel Methods (2005, methodology): “Prior approaches to this task (Miller et al., 2000; Zelenko et al., 2003) have relied on partial or full syntactic analysis.”
- Exploring Various Knowledge in Relation Extraction (2005, methodology): “Miller et al (2000) augmented syntactic full parse trees with semantic information corresponding to entities and relations, and built generative models for the augmented trees.”