Do Subjects Separate (or Are They Sophisticated)?

By John Hey, Jinkwon Lee. 2005

159 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f20bedc5a73981d7268420c80fd1642536613818

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Marco Mariotti
2. Paola Manzini
3. Michal Krawczyk
4. Fabrice Le Lec
5. Paulo Natenzon

In General Decision Sciences

1. Marco Mariotti
2. Paola Manzini
3. Michal Krawczyk
4. Fabrice Le Lec
5. Paulo Natenzon

In Safety Research

1. Marco Mariotti
2. Paola Manzini
3. Michal Krawczyk
4. Fabrice Le Lec

Citations in the corpus

• Paradoxes and mechanisms for choice under risk (2014, unknown): “Starmer and Sugden (1991) and Hey and Lee (2005a) 11 test isolation against the alternative hypothesis that subjects make all choices so as to yield the most preferred probability distribution of payoffs from the whole experiment (called “full reduction”). Their tests reject full reduction in favor ”
• CATEGORIZE THEN CHOOSE: BOUNDEDLY RATIONAL CHOICE AND WELFARE (2012, background): “Hey and Lee [19] for another recent application.”
• ‘Give me a chance!’ An experiment in social decision under risk (2010, background): “For a more general discussion about such an issue, see also Hey and Lee (2005).”