Interrogative Investigations: The Form, Meaning, and Use of English Interrogatives

By J. Ginzburg, Ivan A. Sag. 2001

634 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

English filler-gap constructions (2010, background): “…for the existence of whtraces , not from 'wanna-contraction' (Postal and Pullum 1982, Sag and Fodor 1994; Pullum 1997), not from auxiliary contraction (Pullum and Zwicky 1997) not from floated quantifiers (Sag and Fodor 1994; Sag 2000), and not from weak crossover phenomena (Dalrymple et al. 2001).”
Periphrasis as collocation (2015, methodology): “Indeed, under the analysis of Ginzburg & Sag (2000), in both cases the nonfinite verb heads a VP which has the function of complement of the matrix verb.”
"Wh"-exclamatives in Catalan (2006, background): “Chapter 5 proposes that exclamatives denote facts (Ginzburg and Sag, 2001) and I analyze the consequences of this claim.”
Sign-Based Construction Grammar: An Informal Synopsis (2012, background): “…, this inventory of CAT features has been integrated into a system that provides a reasonably well - worked out account of ' main clause phenomena ' , including construction - specific variation regarding the possibility of ( or requirement for ) auxiliary ' inversion ' ( Ginzburg and Sag 2000 ) .”
The Semantics of Imperatives within a Theory of Clause Types (2004, background): “Clauses are "typed" through a combination of grammatical properties, as in the construction grammar approach (Michaelis & Lambrecht 1 996, Kathol 2000, Ginzburg & Sag 2001 ).”