Future material demand for automotive lithium-based batteries

By Chengjian Xu, Q. Dai, L. Gaines, Mingming Hu, Arnold Tukker, Bernhard Steubing. Communications Materials, 2020

701 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The world is shifting to electric vehicles to mitigate climate change. Here, we quantify the future demand for key battery materials, considering potential electric vehicle fleet and battery chemistry developments as well as second-use and recycling of electric vehicle batteries. We find that in a lithium nickel cobalt manganese oxide dominated battery scenario, demand is estimated to increase by factors of 18–20 for lithium, 17–19 for cobalt, 28–31 for nickel, and 15–20 for most other materials from 2020 to 2050, requiring a drastic expansion of lithium, cobalt, and nickel supply chains and likely additional resource discovery. However, uncertainties are large. Key factors are the development of the electric vehicles fleet and battery capacity requirements per vehicle. If other battery chemistries were used at large scale, e.g. lithium iron phosphate or novel lithium-sulphur or lithium-air batteries, the demand for cobalt and nickel would be substantially smaller. Closed-loop recycling plays a minor, but increasingly important role for reducing primary material demand until 2050, however, advances in recycling are necessary to economically recover battery-grade materials from end-of-life batteries. Second-use of electric vehicles batteries further delays recycling potentials. Lithium-ion-based batteries are a key enabler for the global shift towards electric vehicles. Here, considering developments in battery chemistry and number of electric vehicles, analysis reveals the increasing amounts of lithium, cobalt and nickel that could be needed.

Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Mechanical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f1b1225356565f4be3b01433812204e03d8d2bea

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Automotive Engineering

  1. Henrik Lund
  2. Mark Z. Jacobson
  3. Benjamin Sovacool
  4. Brian Vad Mathiesen

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

  1. Christian Breyer
  2. Brian Vad Mathiesen
  3. D. Bogdanov
  4. Henrik Lund
  5. A. Aghahosseini
  6. Marta Victoria
  7. M. Ram
  8. Ayobami Solomon Oyewo

In Mechanical Engineering

  1. Brian Vad Mathiesen
  2. Henrik Lund
  3. Vasilis Fthenakis
  4. Marco Raugei
  5. Benjamin Sovacool

Citations in the corpus