Justice sensitivity : assessment and location in the personality space

371 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Individual differences in third-party interventions: How justice sensitivity shapes altruistic punishment (2011, methodology): “Several studies have addressed the specificity of the perspectives of justice sensitivity (Fetchenhauer & Huang, 2004; Gollwitzer, Rothmund, Pfeiffer, & Ensenbach, 2009; Gollwitzer, Schmitt, Schalke, Maes, & Baer, 2005; Lotz, Schlösser, Cain, & Fetchenhauer, 2011; Schmitt et al., 2005) and have demo”
Why and when justice sensitivity leads to pro- and antisocial behavior (2009, background): “Recent research has shown that these three justice sensitivity perspectives are positively intercorrelated, and that they all correlate positively with a number of justice-related traits and attitudes, such as belief in a just world, belief in immanent and ultimate justice, and sense of injustice (S”
Procedural justice in contacts with the police: testing a relational model of authority in a mixed methods study (2011, positive): “The Justice Sensitivity Scale (Schmitt, Gollwitzer, Maes, & Arbach, 2005) measures how sensitively individuals react to unfair events in the role of a victim (a victim role is distinguished from roles of perpetrator and an observer of an unfair event).”