From Universal Values to Millennium Development Goals: Lost in Translation
By A. Saith. 2006
347 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Development, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f1a8e925b6687f89a652386e7bcac16bc4152e07
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Development
In Safety Research
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- International norm dynamics and the "end of poverty": Understanding the millennium development goals (2011, background): “…after shock therapy), it remained a potential alternative as it appealed to many in the incoming Bush administration in the US, was supported by influential right-wing thinktanks (such as the Cato Institute, American Enterprise Institute and the Heritage 72 Antrobus, 2003; Eyben, 2006; Saith, 2006.”
- Politics of ‘Leaving No One Behind’: Contesting the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals Agenda (2017, background): “Neither have they engaged with, or sought to learn lessons from well-sustained critical analyses of the MDGs and the zero-draft of the SDGs (cf. indicatively Amin, 2006; Saith, 2006; Satterthwaite, 2003; Sexsmith & McMichael, 2015; Weber, 2014b, 2015).”
- Social Protection for the Poor and Poorest in Developing Countries: Reflections on a Quiet Revolution (2009, background): “For critiques see Clemens, Kenny and Moss (2004) and Saith (2006) .”
- The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs): A Short History of the World’s Biggest Promise (2009, background): “At a deeper level, the structures of global capitalism can be seen as shaping the MDGs (Saith, 2006).”
- The Making of the Millennium Development Goals: Human Development Meets Results-Based Management in an Imperfect World (2007, background): “While the radical Left saw this as a sell out (Saith, 2006) – an acceptance of global capitalism – for the centre Left and centre Right this was a ‘consensus’.”
- Global Goals as a Policy Tool: Intended and Unintended Consequences (2014, methodology): “These include the methodology by which they were set: the arbitrary and inconsistent methodology used in defining each of the individual goals (Saith 2006; Easterly 2009); the resultant bias to Africa and other countries with low starting points (Easterly 2009); and the sheer implausibility of the…”