The 'best available science' to inform 1.5 [deg]C policy choices

By G. P. Peters. 2016

106 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f1a57d8efc7256420f2e8b94216560f5508e66da

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Pete Smith
2. Felix Creutzig
3. M. Callaghan
4. Sabine Fuss
5. J. Minx
6. W. Lamb
7. J. Kuriakose
8. A. Larkin

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Sabine Fuss
2. J. Minx
3. W. Lamb
4. M. Callaghan
5. Felix Creutzig
6. Gregory F. Nemet
7. J. Kuriakose
8. Pete Smith

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

1. Felix Creutzig
2. Pete Smith
3. Gregory F. Nemet
4. Kevin Anderson
5. Joeri Rogelj
6. Sabine Fuss
7. W. Lamb
8. J. Minx

Citations in the corpus

• What if negative emission technologies fail at scale? Implications of the Paris Agreement for big emitting nations (2018, background): “However as Anderson and Bows (2011) note, even when allowance is made for a delay, current significant differences in CO2 per capita between wealthy and poorer nations still leaves cumulative emissions per capita within 2°C scenarios larger in wealthier nations.”
• Negative emissions—Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects (2018, background): “As section 2 has shown, BECCS features prominently in the IAM scenario literature and has been subject to considerable scrutiny since the IPCC’s Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) in 2014 (Fuss et al 2014, Anderson and Peters 2016).”