Boston Naming Test

By E. Kaplan, H. Goodglass, Sandra Weintraub, Osa Segal. 2001

4,941 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ba0c202647aee87b20174d9a798811bfce08ed65

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Metabolic brain networks associated with cognitive function in Parkinson's disease (2007, methodology): “Significant correlations were not present between PDCP expression and performance on the BNT, WCST, MMSE, Hooper VOT, and the Beck Depression Inventory.”
Using mice to model Alzheimer's dementia: an overview of the clinical disease and the preclinical behavioral changes in 10 mouse models (2014, background): “Clinically, many of the neuropsychological tests that assess working memory rely heavily on the use of verbal tasks (Kaplan et al., 1978; Benedict et al., 1998; Spreen and Strauss, 1998; Delis et al., 2000), employing language as a core construct and thus are not feasible to model using mice.”
Factors moderating neuropsychological outcomes following mild traumatic brain injury: A meta-analysis (2005, methodology): “Measures included within the nine domains are:global cognitive ability—Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales (Wechsler, 1987a, 1997a), National Adult Reading Test (Nelson & Willison, 1991), and the General Neuropsychological Deficit Scale from the Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery (Reitan”
Clinicopathological and imaging correlates of progressive aphasia and apraxia of speech. (2006, methodology): “Tasks most often included several subtests from the Minnesota Test for Differential Diagnosis of Aphasia (Schuell, 1972), the Boston Naming Test (Kaplan et al., 2001), Part V of the Token Test Progressive aphasia and apraxia of speech Brain (2006), 129, 1385–1398 1387 (DeRenzi and Vignolo, 1962)…”