Models of pace-of-life syndromes (POLS): a systematic review

By Kimberley J. Mathot, Willem E. Frankenhuis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2018

102 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f18bf9b15cfb6f782e6da5f8c31eb646e92bb2e4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. N. Dingemanse
2. Denis Réale
3. N. Dochtermann
4. Petri T. Niemelä
5. Melanie Dammhahn
6. M. A. Berdal
7. Courtney R. Garrison
8. Raphaël Royauté

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Petri T. Niemelä
2. Melanie Dammhahn
3. N. Dingemanse
4. Denis Réale

Citations in the corpus

• Pace-of-life syndromes: a framework for the adaptive integration of behaviour, physiology and life history (2018, background): “Rigorously reviewing the theoretical basis of POLS, Mathot and Frankenhuis (2018), topical collection on Pace-of-life syndromes evaluated theoretical models providing adaptive explanations for the covariation between POLS-traits while assuming a trade-off between current and future reproduction.”
• Paceless life? A meta-analysis of the pace-of-life syndrome hypothesis (2018, background): “…despite this intuitive conceptual framework, there have been fewmathematical treatments of whether and how behaviors should covary with physiology and life-history (Wolf et al. 2007; Engqvist et al. 2015; reviewed in Mathot and Frankenhuis 2018, topical collection on Pace-of-life syndromes).”