A narrative analysis of postwar tax changes

129 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A New Action-Based Dataset of Fiscal Consolidation (2011, background): “The estimated budgetary effect of the tax hike was $4.2 billion (Romer and Romer, 2009, p. 72) or 0.096 percent of GDP. United States 1988 Fiscal consolidation amounted to 0.85 percent of GDP, with a tax hike of 0.39 percent of GDP and a spending cut of 0.46 percent of GDP.”
Fiscal Foresight and Information Flows (2012, methodology): “…measure the impacts of foreseen changes in fiscal policy, and takes a different—narrative—approach to identification that brings fresh data to bear on the problem [Ramey and Shapiro (1998), Edelberg, Eichenbaum, and Fisher (1999), Ramey (2007), Romer and Romer (2007a), Mertens and Ravn (2008)].”
Macroeconomic Effects From Government Purchases and Taxes (2011, unknown): “Section IV describes the Romer and Romer (2008) measure of changes in federal tax revenue.”
A review of tax research (2010, unknown): “Although we focus our attention on alternative for-profit structures, we acknowledge a number of recent accounting studies looking at the role of taxes and agency problems in the modern non-profit, such as Yetman (2002), Yetman (2003), and Sansing and Yetman (2006). 109 Scholes et al.”
The Dynamic Effects of Personal and Corporate Income Tax Changes in the United States (2013, unknown): “Romer and Romer (2009a) describe almost 50 legislative changes in the tax code over the sample period, many containing changes implemented at different points in time.”