Re-evaluation of RF electromagnetic communication in underwater sensor networks

By Xianhui Che, I. Wells, Gordon Dickers, P. Kear, Xiaochun Gong. IEEE Communications Magazine, 2010

377 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Ocean Engineering, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f1757bb4810c43e15e1298d8cfed56003b4582b1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

1. Melike Erol-Kantarci
2. Hussein T. Mouftah
3. Shu Fu
4. Julian Cheng
5. Yuhan Dong
6. Huihui Zhang
7. Sema Fatma Oktug
8. Georges Kaddoum

In Ocean Engineering

1. Melike Erol-Kantarci
2. Hussein T. Mouftah
3. Shu Fu
4. Julian Cheng
5. Yuhan Dong
6. Huihui Zhang
7. Sema Fatma Oktug
8. Fabio Leccese

In Oceanography

1. Julian Cheng
2. Georges Kaddoum
3. Hemani Kaushal

Citations in the corpus

• A Survey of Underwater Optical Wireless Communications (2017, methodology): “Second, RF method is more tolerant to water turbulence and turbidity than optical and acoustic methods [22].”
• Underwater Optical Wireless Communication (2016, background): “Lot of research has been carried out at RF frequencies for underwater communication [37]–[40] but they suffer from the high losses due to conductivity of sea water.”
• Underwater Optical Wireless Communications: Overview (2020, background): “The RF waves, for their nature, are the more common and diffused technic used on terrestrial communications, but even them are not suitable underwater because, they are strongly attenuated [18].”
• A Survey of Architectures and Localization Techniques for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks (2011, background): “The use of RF signals is considered to be limited to the nodes that are close to the surface only [25], although a recent study provides a different perspective on the use of RF signals under water [26].”