Research priorities for seabirds: improving conservation and management in the 21st century

186 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

How many seabirds do we need to track to define home-range area? (2013, unknown): “2013) and their foraging behaviour (Gremillet et al. 2004; Lewis et al. 2005; McLeay et al. 2010; Grecian et al. 2012; Lewison et al. 2012).”
Seabirds and climate change: roadmap for the future (2012, background): “…107–117, 2012 tion to climate change, threats to seabird populations include habitat loss and degradation due to invasive species, coastal development, physiological stressors due to food shortages and pollution, and mortality due to by-catch in certain types of fishing (i.e. Lewison et al. 2012).”
Ontogeny in marine tagging and tracking science: technologies and data gaps (2012, background): “A recent review by Lewison et al. (2012) identified 6 key elements of seabird ecology in need of additional research, particularly across multiple age classes.”
Are we working towards global research priorities for management and conservation of sea turtles (2016, methodology): “This ap proach has been used on a range of subject areas, from global conservation and biodiversity issues (e.g. Sutherland et al. 2009) to taxon specific initiatives, such as for sea birds (Lewison et al. 2012) and cetaceans (Parsons et al. 2015).”