A mass conservative and water storage consistent variable parameter Muskingum-Cunge approach

By Ezio Todini. 2007

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract. The variable parameter Muskingum-Cunge (MC) flood routing approach, together with several variants proposed in the literature, does not fully preserve the mass balance, particularly when dealing with very mild slopes (

Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Global and Planetary Change, Water Science and Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f13a0649253c3065b87338d837aa9ac72030696b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Civil and Structural Engineering

1. Gurhan Gurarslan
2. Halil Karahan
3. D. Schäfer
4. Luis Samaniego
5. Rohini Kumar
6. Zong Woo Geem
7. Juliane Mai
8. A. Marx

In Global and Planetary Change

1. D. Schäfer
2. Luis Samaniego
3. Rohini Kumar
4. Zong Woo Geem
5. Juliane Mai
6. A. Marx
7. M. Zink
8. S. Thober

In Water Science and Technology

1. Gurhan Gurarslan
2. Halil Karahan
3. D. Schäfer
4. Luis Samaniego
5. Rohini Kumar
6. Juliane Mai
7. A. Marx
8. M. Zink

Citations in the corpus

• The German drought monitor (2015, methodology): “The generated discharge of a model cell consists of direct runoff, baseflow, slow and fast interflow, which, after aggregating its components, is routed through the model domain using the Muskingum-Cunge flood routing algorithm (Chow et al 1988, Todini 2007).”
• Parameter Estimation of the Nonlinear Muskingum Flood-Routing Model Using a Hybrid Harmony Search Algorithm (2013, background): “In MC or MCT, the model parameters do not require an estimation procedure (they all depend on the friction coefficient, which is the only unknown element), while they are updated in time as a function of the mean state variables in the river reach (Todini 2007).”