A Nitsche‐type formulation and comparison of the most common domain decomposition methods in isogeometric analysis
By Andreas Apostolatos, Robert Schmidt, Roland Wüchner, Kai-Uwe Bletzinger. 2014
206 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Mechanics of Materials
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f135f13dfd00b812324db451af43956d1dd473c8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Mechanics
- Wolfgang Dornisch
- Josef Kiendl
- Alessandro Reali
- Ming-Chen Hsu
- Michael C. H. Wu
- Thomas J. R. Hughes
- Yuri Bazilevs
- Enzo Marino
In Mechanics of Materials
- Josef Kiendl
- Wolfgang Dornisch
- Ming-Chen Hsu
- Michael C. H. Wu
- Alessandro Reali
- Thomas J. R. Hughes
- Timon Rabczuk
Citations in the corpus
- Treatment of Reissner–Mindlin shells with kinks without the need for drilling rotation stabilization in an isogeometric framework (2014, methodology): “Suitable methods for these objectives are presented in [30], respectively [31].”
- Isogeometric Kirchhoff–Love shell formulations for general hyperelastic materials (2015, background): “Alternatively, penalty formulations as in [42, 60] or a Nitsche formulation as in [61] may be used for patch coupling.”