Time variations of land water storage from an inversion of 2 years of GRACE geoids

By Guillaume Ramillien, F. Frappart, Anny Cazenave, A. Güntner. 2005

206 citations recorded by the source corpus.

By delivering monthly maps of the gravity field, the GRACE project allows the determination of tiny time variations of the Earth's gravity and particularly the effects of fluid mass redistributions at the surface of the Earth. However, GRACE data represent vertically integrated gravity measurements, thus are the sum of all mass redistributions inside the Earth's system (atmosphere, oceans and continental water storage, plus solid Earth). In this paper, we apply a generalized least-squares inverse approach, previously developed by [1] [G. Ramillien, A. Cazenave, O. Brunau, Global time-variations of hydrological signals from GRACE satellite gravimetry, Geophys. J. Int. 158 (2004) 813–826.], to estimate, from the monthly GRACE geoids, continental water storage variations (and their associated uncertainties) over a 2-year time span (April 2002 to May 2004). Tests demonstrating the robustness of the method are presented, including the separation between liquid water reservoirs (surface waters+soil moisture+groundwaters) and snow pack contributions. Individual monthly solutions of total land water storage from GRACE, with a spatial resolution of ~660 km, are presented for the 2-year time span. We also derive the seasonal cycle map. We further estimate water volume changes over eight large river basins in the tropics and compare with model predictions. Finally, we attempt to estimate an average value of the evapotranspiration over each river basin, using the water balance equation which links temporal change in water volume to precipitation, evapotranspiration and runoff. Amplitudes of the GRACE-derived evapotranspiration are regionally consistent to the predictions of global hydrological models.

Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f11e3e09904378f9613a52dfd89961fea8630fb6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aerospace Engineering

  1. S. Swenson
  2. Guillaume Ramillien
  3. John M. Wahr
  4. James S. Famiglietti
  5. Anny Cazenave
  6. Jean-Philippe Avouac
  7. Jürgen Kusche
  8. Isabella Velicogna

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. James S. Famiglietti
  2. Guillaume Ramillien
  3. John M. Wahr
  4. S. Swenson
  5. Anny Cazenave
  6. Erik Ivins
  7. Isabella Velicogna
  8. Jürgen Kusche

In Oceanography

  1. John M. Wahr
  2. James S. Famiglietti
  3. Guillaume Ramillien
  4. S. Swenson
  5. Anny Cazenave
  6. Erik Ivins
  7. Richard Biancale
  8. A. Lombard

Citations in the corpus