Rationality, Meaning, and the Analysis of Delusion

By John L. Campbell. 2001

187 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f11b3f5311b63fbf9fae14ecfb33fc7eac36ec6d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Elisabeth Pacherie
2. Tim Bayne
3. Shaun Gallagher

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Elisabeth Pacherie
2. Tim Bayne

Citations in the corpus

• In Defence of the Doxastic Conception of Delusions (2005, background): “Campbell (2001) has suggested that delusions are beliefs, but they don’t appear to have the content they seem to have.1 In this paper we leave these accounts to one side, and examine an account of delusions developed by Currie and collaborators (Currie, 2000; Currie and Jureidini, 2001; Currie and…”