Parametrizing recollement data for triangulated categories
By Pedro Nicolás, Manuel Saor'in. 2009
91 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Algebra and Number Theory, Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f11225a9882bdb7d14708d630c5c0c166440c8e5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Algebra and Number Theory
- Jorge Vit'oria
- Chrysostomos Psaroudakis
- Hongxing Chen
- Changchang Xi
- Jiaqun Wei
- Osamu Iyama
- María Inés Platzeck
- Sonia Trepode
In Geometry and Topology
- Jorge Vit'oria
- Chrysostomos Psaroudakis
- Hongxing Chen
- Changchang Xi
- Jiaqun Wei
- Osamu Iyama
- María Inés Platzeck
- Sonia Trepode
In Mathematical Physics
- Chrysostomos Psaroudakis
- Hongxing Chen
- Jorge Vit'oria
- Changchang Xi
- Osamu Iyama
- Ibrahim Assem
- María Inés Platzeck
- Sonia Trepode
Citations in the corpus
- Realisation functors in tilting theory (2015, background): “Note that while ring epimorphisms do not always give rise to recollements of module categories (see [70]), a homological ring epimorphism always gives rise to a recollement of triangulated categories (see [64]).”
- Recollements and Hochschild theory (2011, unknown): “(König [23]; Jørgensen [20]; Nicolás-Saorin [33]) Let A1, A and A2 be algebras.”
- Good tilting modules and recollements of derived module categories (2010, background): “ Lemma 7.4(2), we know that R(∆) is always an intersection of localizations. But, in general, it may not be a localization of R at any multiplication set. For a counterexample, we refer the reader to [33]. A natural question arises: when is R(∆) itself a localization of R at some multiplication set ”