The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics: An Interactive Interpretation

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Do We Really Understand Quantum Mechanics? (2012, background): “Healey [668] has proposed an “interactive interpretation”, which has similarities with a modal interpretation.”
Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics (2003, background): “To simplify this situation, several modal interpretations have restricted themselves to the orthogonal decomposition of the density matrix to define the set of properties that can be assigned (see, for instance, Kochen, 1985; Dieks, 1989; Healey, 1989; Vermaas and Dieks, 1995; Bub, 1997). For exampl”
Dynamical reduction models (2003, background): “These approaches [35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42] rest on the introduction of appropriate rules which allow us to attribute some properties to the subsystems of a composite system even when there is no observable whose outcome can be predicted with certainty.”
Quantum Theory: A Pragmatist Approach (2010, unknown): “In (Healey [1989], p.”
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: a dynamic reference work (2003, unknown): “Healey (1989) was also among the ﬁrst to make use of the biorthogonal decomposition theorem, developing these ideas in a somewhat different direction.”