limate Change and Forest Sinks: Factors Affecting the Costs of Carbon Sequestration

224 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Land-Use Change and Carbon Sinks: Econometric Estimation of the Carbon Sequestration Supply Function (2005, background): “However, as per Stavins and JaEe (1990) and Parks (1995), some technical or resource constraint on ccmvmion could be imposed so that a y S 4,.”
The Equity and Legitimacy of Markets for Ecosystem Services (2007, background): “Yet the cost of carbon sequestration options depends on a variety of factors, including the type of management activities implemented, project contracting and land opportunity costs, and other institutional or organizational aspects (Newell and Stavins, 2000).”
A Review of Forest Carbon Sequestration Cost Studies: A Dozen Years of Research (2004, background): “1 tons/ha/yr – Stavins (1999) c Delta States Carbon flow curve 41 tons/ha – – United States Carbon flow curve – – Newell and Stavins (1999) c Delta States Carbon flow curve 41 tons/ha – – Plantinga (1999) c Maine Carbon flow curve 20–23 tons/ha – –”
How costly are carbon offsets? A meta-analysis of carbon forest sinks (2004, unknown): “39 McCarl and Callaway (1995) 43 68.18 31.58 Moulton and Richards (1990) 70 25.22 24.50 Moura-Costa et al. (1999) 9 3.15 1.30 Newell and Stavins (2000) 53 154.45 57.64 Nordhaus (1991) 6 109.06 103.34 Parks and Hardie (1995) 4 245.23 226.12 Plantinga and Mauldin (2001) 45 31.71 26.56 Plantinga et…”