Robust Physical-World Attacks on Deep Learning Visual Classification

By Kevin Eykholt, Ivan Evtimov, Earlence Fernandes, Bo Li, Amir Rahmati, Chaowei Xiao, Atul Prakash, Tadayoshi Kohno, Dawn Song. 2018

2,198 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Recent studies show that the state-of-the-art deep neural networks (DNNs) are vulnerable to adversarial examples, resulting from small-magnitude perturbations added to the input. Given that that emerging physical systems are using DNNs in safety-critical situations, adversarial examples could mislead these systems and cause dangerous situations. Therefore, understanding adversarial examples in the physical world is an important step towards developing resilient learning algorithms. We propose a general attack algorithm, Robust Physical Perturbations (RP2), to generate robust visual adversarial perturbations under different physical conditions. Using the real-world case of road sign classification, we show that adversarial examples generated using RP2 achieve high targeted misclassification rates against standard-architecture road sign classifiers in the physical world under various environmental conditions, including viewpoints. Due to the current lack of a standardized testing method, we propose a two-stage evaluation methodology for robust physical adversarial examples consisting of lab and field tests. Using this methodology, we evaluate the efficacy of physical adversarial manipulations on real objects. With a perturbation in the form of only black and white stickers, we attack a real stop sign, causing targeted misclassification in 100% of the images obtained in lab settings, and in 84.8% of the captured video frames obtained on a moving vehicle (field test) for the target classifier.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Molecular Biology, Safety, Robustness & Interpretability

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Mohit Bansal
  2. Jun Zhu
  3. Percy Liang
  4. Jianfeng Gao
  5. Alan L. Yuille
  6. Bernt Schiele
  7. Bo Li
  8. Zhe Gan

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Luc Van Gool
  2. Dacheng Tao
  3. Ming-Hsuan Yang
  4. Xiaogang Wang
  5. Alan L. Yuille
  6. Trevor Darrell
  7. Jitendra Malik
  8. Bernt Schiele

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

  1. Huan Zhang
  2. Cho-Jui Hsieh
  3. J. Kolter
  4. Tianyu Pang
  5. Alan L. Yuille
  6. Eric Wong
  7. Erik Poll
  8. Joost Visser

In Molecular Biology

  1. Jun Zhu
  2. Tianyu Pang
  3. Yinpeng Dong
  4. Hang Su
  5. Cho-Jui Hsieh
  6. Aleksander Madry
  7. Pin-Yu Chen
  8. Huan Zhang

In Safety, Robustness & Interpretability

  1. Matthias Hein
  2. Cho-Jui Hsieh
  3. Tianyu Pang
  4. Huan Zhang
  5. Jun Zhu
  6. Nicholas Carlini
  7. Yinpeng Dong
  8. Hang Su

Citations in the corpus