How Sensitive Are Ecosystem Services in European Forest Landscapes to Silvicultural Treatment

By Peter Biber, J. Borges, R. Moshammer, S. Barreiro, B. Botequim, Yvonne Brodrechtová, V. Brukas, Gherardo Chirici, R. Cordero-Debets, E. Corrigan and 22 more. 2015

132 citations recorded by the source corpus.

While sustainable forestry in Europe is characterized by the provision of a multitude of forest ecosystem services, there exists no comprehensive study that scrutinizes their sensitivity to forest management on a pan-European scale, so far. We compile scenario runs from regionally tailored forest growth models and Decision Support Systems (DSS) from 20 case studies throughout Europe and analyze whether the ecosystem service provision depends on management intensity and other co-variables, comprising regional affiliation, social environment, and tree species composition. The simulation runs provide information about the case-specifically most important ecosystem services in terms of appropriate indicators. We found a strong positive correlation between management intensity and wood production, but only weak correlation with protective and socioeconomic forest functions. Interestingly, depending on the forest region, we found that biodiversity can react in both ways, positively and negatively, to increased management intensity. Thus, it may be in tradeoff or in synergy with wood production and forest resource maintenance. The covariables species composition and social environment are of punctual interest only, while the affiliation to a certain region often makes an important difference in terms of an ecosystem service’s treatment sensitivity.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f0b26f2465188d6663fcc50023aca6caa3e78506

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

  1. Hans Pretzsch
  2. Peter Biber
  3. Eric K. Zenner
  4. G. Schütze
  5. D. Forrester
  6. S. Condés
  7. M. Río
  8. Hubert Sterba

In Insect Science

  1. Hans Pretzsch

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

  1. Hans Pretzsch
  2. Peter Biber
  3. Eric K. Zenner
  4. G. Schütze
  5. D. Forrester
  6. S. Condés
  7. M. Río
  8. Hubert Sterba

Citations in the corpus