Domain-specific variation in disgust sensitivity across the menstrual cycle
By Daniel M.T. Fessler, C. David Navarrete. 2003
198 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f08dbd8210ec4a81d2441d64248adbed3a7742c0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Mark Schaller
- Megan Oaten
- Richard J. Stevenson
- T. Case
- Debra Lieberman
- Joshua M. Tybur
- Jon K. Maner
- Robert Kurzban
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- David M. Buss
- Jon K. Maner
- Debra Lieberman
- Mark Schaller
- Joshua M. Tybur
- B. Jones
- Megan Oaten
- Richard J. Stevenson
In Social Psychology
- Mark Schaller
- David M. Buss
- Debra Lieberman
- C. David Navarrete
- Daniel M.T. Fessler
- Megan Oaten
- Richard J. Stevenson
- T. Case
Citations in the corpus
- Adaptations to Ovulation (2005, background): “Fessler and Navarrete (2003) assessed women’s disgust in several domains: maladaptive sex such as incest and bestiality, food aversiveness, and filth.”
- Women's preferences for masculinity in male faces are predicted by pathogen disgust, but not by moral or sexual disgust (2010, background): “Additionally, concern about pathogens (and, presumably, disgust sensitivity) has been hypothesized to change across the menstrual cycle (Fessler & Navarrete, 2003).”
- Disgust and mating strategy (2015, background): “In this paper, we focus on sexual disgust, an emotion that has been hypothesized to "reduce participation in biologically suboptimal sexual behaviors" (Fessler & Navarrete, 2003, p. 406).”
- Disgust as a disease-avoidance mechanism. (2009, methodology): “However, for some researchers (e.g., Case, Repacholi, & Stevenson, 2006; Curtis & Biran, 2001; Davey, 1994; Fessler & Navarrete, 2003; Royzman & Sabini, 2001; Schaller & Duncan, 2007; Toronchuk & Ellis, 2007), this relationship is central to their functional conception of disgust.”
- Elevated disgust sensitivity in the first trimester of pregnancy: Evidence supporting the compensatory prophylaxis hypothesis (2005, background): “Although disgust sensitivity varies by age ( Fessler & Navarrete, 2003a; Quigley, Sherman, & Sherman, 1997), because participants did not differ significantly in age across trimester groups, this variable was not included.”
- Third-party attitudes toward sibling incest: Evidence for Westermarck's hypotheses (2004, background): “Given that it is likely that disgust originally evolved to protect against pathogen exposure (Curtis et al., 2004; Fessler & Navarrete, 2003b) and was subsequently exapted to the domain of sexual behavior (Cosmides & Tooby, 2000; Fessler & Navarrete, 2003a ), it may simply not have been possible to”
- The voice and face of woman: One ornament that signals quality? (2005, unknown): “Many published studies have used Internet-based tests to assess face preferences and other behaviors (Fessler & Navarrete, 2003; Jones et al., 2005; Little, Burt, Penton-Voak, & Perrett, 2001; Little & Jones, 2003; Little, Jones, Penton-Voak, Burt, & Perrett, 2002, 2003; Oates & Wilson, 2002), and…”
- Risk-taking as a situationally sensitive male mating strategy (2008, background): “Conversely, disgust may help women avoid risks associated with exposure to contagion, an especially pernicious adaptive problem for women because of potential infection of offspring (Fessler & Navarrete, 2003).”
- Disgust: evolved function and structure. (2013, background): “…Keane, Manes, Antoun, & Young, 2000; Curtis , Aunger, & Rabie, 2004; Curtis & Biran, 2001; Curtis et al., 2011; Fessler, Eng, & Navarrete, 2005; Fessler & Navarrete, 2003a; Fleischman & Fessler, 2011; Kelly, 2011; Marzillier & Davey, 2004; Oaten et al., 2009; Olatunji & Sawchuk, 2005; Rozin…”