Island biogeography of the Mediterranean sea: the species–area relationship for terrestrial isopods

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Which function describes the species–area relationship best? A review and empirical evaluation (2009, methodology): “…themselves (e.g. Barret et al., 2003; Panitsa et al., 2006; Hannus & von Numers, 2008) or because they demonstrated it only graphically (MacArthur & Wilson, 1967) or with the same statistically flawed approach as used by Lomolino & Weiser (2001) (e.g. Gentile & Argano, 2005; Triantis et al., 2006).”
Habitat diversity, ecological requirements of species and the Small Island Effect (2009, methodology): “According to Sfenthourakis (1996a) and Gentile & Argano (2005), the isopod fauna of small islands is dominated by common species with broader distributions than those of larger islands.”
Re‐approaching the small island effect (2006, unknown): “…Botsaris, 1996; Morrison, 1997; Brown & Lomolino, 1998; Kelt, 2000; Lomolino, 2000, 2002; Anderson & Wait, 2001; Lomolino & Perault, 2001; Lomolino & Weiser, 2001; Whittaker et al., 2001; Triantis, 2002; Barrett et al., 2003; Triantis et al., 2003, 2005; Whittaker, 2004; Gentile & Argano, 2005).”
Patterns of species richness on very small islands: the plants of the Aegean archipelago (2006, methodology): “Nevertheless, the method we used here has certain methodological problems (see Gentile & Argano, 2005), but it is the only one available so far for the detection of the SIE.”