Sensitivity curves for searches for gravitational-wave backgrounds
By E. Thrane, J. Romano. 2013
460 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We propose a graphical representation of detector sensitivity curves for stochastic gravitational-wave backgrounds that takes into account the increase in sensitivity that comes from integrating over frequency in addition to integrating over time. This method is valid for backgrounds that have a power-law spectrum in the analysis band. We call these graphs “power-law integrated curves.” For simplicity, we consider cross-correlation searches for unpolarized and isotropic stochastic backgrounds using two or more detectors. We apply our method to construct power-law integrated sensitivity curves for second-generation ground-based detectors such as Advanced LIGO, space-based detectors such as LISA and the Big Bang Observer, and timing residuals from a pulsar timing array. The code used to produce these plots is available at https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-P1300115/public for researchers interested in constructing similar sensitivity curves.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f065e95be8a71cb63bdf0eb2f2c8d79bf71a9e17
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Marek Lewicki
- Marco Peloso
- C. Caprini
- John Ellis
- J. No
- V. Vaskonen
- Daniel G. Figueroa
- Juan García-Bellido
Citations in the corpus
- Science with the space-based interferometer LISA. IV: probing inflation with gravitational waves (2016, methodology): “Then, employing an analogous procedure to that introduced in [76], an upper bound for ΩGW(f) can be found for a given range of possible values of the spectral index.”
- Gravitational-wave sensitivity curves (2014, methodology): “Jenet et al., 2006). An alternative method for graphically representing the sensitivity of a GW detector to stochastic backgrounds, called the power-law-integrated sensitivity curve, was suggested by Thrane and Romano (2013). This method accounts for the there being power across all frequencies in t”
- Probing the gravitational wave background from cosmic strings with LISA (2019, methodology): “[172] introduced a very useful concept: the power law sensitivity curve (PLS) of a detector.”
- Reconstructing the spectral shape of a stochastic gravitational wave background with LISA (2019, methodology): “[127] for constructing PLS curves indicates that the analysis of SGWBs with complex spectral shapes is in principle feasible with LISA, provided that sufficient SNR is available.”
- Oscillations in the stochastic gravitational wave background from sharp features and particle production during inflation (2020, methodology): “The sensitivity curves shown here have been computed in [8] and correspond to the power-law-integrated sensitivity (PLIS) curves defined in [61].”
- Beyond the Standard Models with cosmic strings (2019, methodology): “s(f) 2 ! 1=2 : (110) For a given pair (SNR;T), one obtains a series in of power-law integrated curves. One denes the power-law integrated sensitivity curve PI(f) as the envelope of those functions [223] PI(f) max 2 4f SNR p T Z fmax f min df f h2 sens(f) 2 ! 1=2 3 5: (111) Any SGWB signal GW(f) w”
- Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. II: gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions (2015, methodology): “The power law sensitivity curve is a concept developed in [34] with the aim of accounting for the improvement in the usual sensitivity curves of a GW detector that comes from the broadband nature of a stochastic signal.”
- Challenges and opportunities of gravitational-wave searches at MHz to GHz frequencies (2020, methodology): “…band from fmin to fmax for a time Tobs, the signal-to-noise ratio can be written as (Thrane and Romano 2013): q2sto ¼ TobsMðM 1Þ Z fmax fmin df S2hðf Þ S2nðf Þ : ð12Þ We redirect the reader to Allen and Romano (1999); Thrane and Romano (2013); Romano and Cornish (2017) for a full analysis.”
- Primordial black holes confront LIGO/Virgo data: current situation (2020, methodology): “By calculating the stochastic GW background arising from the coalescences of PBH binaries and comparing its strength to the sensitivity of LIGO [86, 87], one can constrain the fraction of DM in PBHs.”
- Baryogenesis from the weak scale to the grand unification scale (2020, background): “(151) The shaded regions indicate the power-law-integrated sensitivity curves of current and planned experiments (Thrane and Romano, 2013).”
- Gravitational wave constraints on the primordial black hole dominated early universe (2020, unknown): “For instance, the frequency corresponding to the peak of the early isocurvature perturbation at kUV is given by fUV ≈ 1.7× 103Hz ( gH(TPBH) 108 )1/6( g∗(Teva) 106.75 )1/4( g∗,s(Teva) 106.75 )−1/3( MPBH,f 104g )−5/6 , (2.33) which interestingly may enter the current observational window of the LIGO/V”
- New limits on cosmic strings from gravitational wave observation (2017, methodology): “The instrumental curves are in the “power-law integrated” form [22], and were calculated using the publicly available codes used in Ref.”
- Gravitational-wave cosmology across 29 decades in frequency (2015, unknown): “Romano [50].”