What Is Said And Psychological Reality; Grice's Project And Relevance Theorists' Criticisms

By Jennifer Saul. 2002

129 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f0622f6e75eec92c7e8df351239c7a1d60ed4458

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. Jennifer Saul

Citations in the corpus

• The co-constitution of politeness implicature in conversation (2007, unknown): “However, if the reference turns out to be for a typing job, I fail to imply he or she is unsuitable for the job, and in fact do quite the opposite (Saul, 2002a: 230).”
• Simple Sentences, Substitution, and Intuitions (2007, methodology): “What counts ¹⁹ Richard, like other theorists including David Braun (2000: 203), uses ‘Russellianism’ to refer to the view I have called ‘Naïve Millianism’.”
• Overspecification facilitates object identification (2011, background): “Saul (2002) argues that this was not Grice’s project; his aim was not to describe in a psychologically plausible way what is said and what is implicated.”