Concept versus data in delimitation of plant genera

By A. M. Humphreys, H. P. Linder. 2009

88 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f03a129eff397ad91378155a9a64dac8ab40d0c8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Harald Schneider
2. Xian-chun Zhang
3. E. Schuettpelz
4. P. Wolf
5. Michael S. Barker
6. R. Moran
7. Alan R. Smith
8. K. Sytsma

In Genetics

1. J. González-Gallegos
2. Harald Schneider
3. Jay B. Walked
4. B. Drew
5. Chun‐Lei Xiang
6. R. Moran
7. N. Nagalingum
8. K. Sytsma

In Plant Science

1. Harald Schneider
2. R. Moran
3. Jason R. Grant
4. R. Kriebel
5. E. Schuettpelz
6. Petra Korall
7. Hanna Tuomisto

Citations in the corpus

• Salvia united: The greatest good for the greatest number (2017, background): “…at the generic level, that are at issue with respect to Salvia include names that are clear, universal, predictive, and stable (Stevens, 1985, 2002; Humphreys & Linder, 2009), and utility of the classification to both the systematic and larger public enterprises (Stevens, 1985; Sytsma & Pires,…”
• A community‐derived classification for extant lycophytes and ferns (2016, background): “Notably, resolution via integration, and the resulting recognition of larger genera, appears to bemuchmore common in flowering plants (Humphreys & Linder, 2009).”