EPOS LHC: Test of collective hadronization with data measured at the CERN Large Hadron Collider

By Tanguy Pierog, Iurii Karpenko, J. Katzy, E. Yatsenko, Klaus Werner. 2015

1,026 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f033081b6aedd8771d6af6a9b1d03bac1910a93c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

1. Atlas Collaboration
2. Cms Collaboration
3. P. Braun-Munzinger
4. J. Stachel
5. Juan Rojo
6. Alice Collaboration
7. Angela V. Olinto
8. A. Andronic

Citations in the corpus

• The Angantyr model for heavy-ion collisions in Pythia8 (2018, methodology): “This is indeed also the case in contemporary studies at the LHC and RHIC.”
• ForwArd Search ExpeRiment at the LHC (2017, methodology): “Left: π0 and η multiplicities from EPOS-LHC [52] (circles), QGSJET-II-04 [53] (squares), and SIBYLL 2.”
• Heavy Neutral Leptons at FASER (2018, methodology): “In particular, we use Monte-Carlo event generator EPOS-LHC [35], as implemented in the CRMC simulation package [36], to simulate the kaon distributions.”
• Robust Independent Validation of Experiment and Theory: Rivet version 3 (2019, methodology): “Rivet has been widely used in the development [2–8], validation [9–16] and tuning [17–19] of event generators for Standard Model processes, as well as in the study of parton density functions (PDFs) [20,21].”
• Hadronic interaction model sibyll 2.3d and extensive air showers (2020, background): “§ III contains the benchmark calculations and comparisons against other contemporary post-LHC models [28, 29] including the previous Sibyll 2.”
• Measurement of the Inelastic Proton-Proton Cross Section at root s=13 TeV with the ATLAS Detector at the LHC (2016, methodology): “E pos LHC [35] uses a “cut pomeron” model for di ff raction and di ff ers significantly from P ythia 8 in its modeling of had-ronization and the underlying event.”
• The POEMMA (Probe of Extreme Multi-Messenger Astrophysics) observatory (2020, methodology): “J C A P 0 6 ( 2 0 2 1 ) 0 0 7 1910 2010 E [eV] 700 720 740 760 780 800 820 840 860 880 900 ]2 [g /c m 〉 m ax X〈 iron proto n Auger FD ICRC19 POEMMA Nadir 5 yr 1910 2010 E [eV] 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 ]2 ) [g /c m m ax (Xσ EPOS-LHC Sibyll2.”
• Multiplicity dependence of light-flavor hadron production in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV (2019, methodology): “While similarities in the production of light-flavor hadrons between p-Pb and Pb–Pb collisions at comparable event multiplicities have been discussed previously [4, 6], the measurements presented here allow a unique comparison of the observables with several QCD-inspired event generators such as PYT”
• Enhanced production of multi-strange hadrons in high-multiplicity proton–proton collisions (2016, result): “The evolution of strangeness enhancement seen at the LHC steadily increases as a function of (cid:104) d N ch / d η (cid:105) from low-multiplicity pp to high multiplicity p–Pb and reaches the values observed in Pb–Pb collisions.”
• Depth of Ultra High Energy Cosmic Ray Induced Air Shower Maxima Measured by the Telescope Array Black Rock and Long Ridge FADC Fluorescence Detectors and Surface Array in Hybrid Mode (2018, methodology): “This uncertainty in 〈Xmax〉 at 1019.5 eV is about the same as the difference in 〈Xmax〉 predicted among the deepest model (EPOS LHC) and the shallowest model (QGSJet01c).”
• Transverse momentum spectra and nuclear modification factors of charged particles in pp, p-Pb and Pb-Pb collisions at the LHC (2018, background): “The first Pb-Pb collisions at √ sNN = 5.02 TeV were delivered by the LHC in 2015.”
• Charged-particle nuclear modification factors in PbPb and pPb collisions at √(s_N N) = 5.02 TeV (2017, methodology): “While the lower-threshold triggers had to be prescaled because of the high instantaneous luminosity of the LHC, the highest threshold trigger was always unprescaled.”
• FASER’s physics reach for long-lived particles (2018, methodology): “[42] T.”
• Open Questions in Cosmic-Ray Research at Ultrahigh Energies (2019, positive): “For comparison, the predictions of 〈Xmax〉 of proton- and iron-initiated air showers simulations using hadronic interaction models (Ostapchenko, 2011; Pierog et al., 2015; Riehn et al., 2016) tuned to LHC data are shown as red and blue lines.”