The Dynamic Effects of Personal and Corporate Income Tax Changes in the United States: Comment

By Carsten Jentsch, Kurt G. Lunsford. The American Economic Review, 2019

182 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Mertens and Ravn (2013) estimate impulse response functions (IRFs) from income tax changes in a structural vector autoregression (SVAR) by using narrative accounts of tax liability changes as proxy variables. To produce confidence intervals for their IRFs, they use a residual-based wild bootstrap, which has subsequently become popular in the proxy SVAR literature. We argue that their wild bootstrap is not valid, producing confidence intervals that are much too small. Using a residual-based moving block bootstrap that is proven to be asymptotically valid, we reestimate confidence intervals for Mertens and Ravn’s (2013) IRFs and find no statistically significant effects of tax changes on output, labor, and investment. (JEL E23, E62, H24, H25, H31, H32)

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f032f1d3c0f5c58d089569f46ce7fca719339d1f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. Francesco Giavazzi
  2. Matteo Paradisi
  3. A. Alesina
  4. Jiří Slačálek
  5. Carlo A. Favero
  6. Omar Barbiero
  7. M. Lenza
  8. Elvire Guillaud

Citations in the corpus