Turning Unemployment into Self-Employment: Effectiveness of Two Start-Up Programmes

By Hans J. Baumgartner, Marco Caliendo. 2008

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f022545dea439de6a86c8bac3ed0d18ff79112e0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Steffen Künn
2. C. Román
3. J. M. Millán
4. E. Congregado
5. Jan Bernhardt
6. Marco Caliendo
7. J. Allmendinger
8. Lena Hipp

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Steffen Künn
2. Jan Bernhardt
3. Marco Caliendo
4. J. Allmendinger
5. Lena Hipp

In Statistics and Probability

1. Steffen Künn
2. J. M. Millán
3. Marco Caliendo
4. R. Palmer-jones
5. Maren Duvendack
6. M. Qaim
7. Mekbib G. Haile
8. Degnet Abebaw

Citations in the corpus

• Institutions and the prevalence of nonstandard employment (2015, background): “While studies on the relationship between opportunity costs and starting a new business are scarce, some evaluations of start-up programs for the unemployed suggest that subsidies are successful at increasing self-employment (and decreasing unemployment) (Cueto and Mato, 2006; Baumgartner and Calien”
• Start-Up Subsidies for the Unemployed: Long-Term Evidence and Effect Heterogeneity (2011, methodology): “Participants in SUS are on average younger and lower educated individuals with less 7Therefore, we only briefly discuss the basic data construction and refer to Baumgartner and Caliendo (2008) for a more extensive discussion of the data issues.”
• Dependent self-employment as a way to evade employment protection legislation (2011, background): “(2003) for UK, Perry (2006) for New Zealand, Cueto and Mato (2006) for Spain, Pfeiffer and Reize (2000), Baumgartner and Caliendo (2008) and Caliendo and Kritikos (2009) for Germany, and Carling and Richardson (2001) for Sweden.”
• The Schumpeterian entrepreneur: a review of the empirical evidence on the antecedents, behaviour and consequences of innovative entrepreneurship (2017, unknown): “For these reasons, and also based on a number of evaluation studies on the (non-)effectiveness of public policy to promote entrepreneurship (e.g. Baumgartner and Caliendo 2008; Kösters 2010; Koski and Pajarinen 2013; Rannikko and Autio 2016), the recent academic debate on public policy to promote…”