The Estonian version of the NEO‐PI‐R: an examination of universal and culture‐specific aspects of the Five‐Factor Model

By T. Kallasmaa, Jüri Allik, Anu Realo, R. McCrae. 2000

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f00f98aeba428829287e1e860905b88690775567

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Helle Pullmann
2. Jüri Allik
3. K. Konstabel
4. R. Mõttus
5. T. Aavik
6. R. McCrae
7. Dawn A. Matsumoto
8. Anne-Wil Harzing

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Helle Pullmann
2. Jüri Allik
3. K. Konstabel
4. R. Mõttus
5. T. Aavik
6. R. McCrae
7. Dawn A. Matsumoto

In Social Psychology

1. Helle Pullmann
2. Jüri Allik
3. R. Mõttus
4. R. McCrae
5. Dawn A. Matsumoto
6. Peter B. Smith

Citations in the corpus

• Toward More Readable Big Five Personality Inventories (2006, methodology): “Incidentally, the “wrong” loading of the N5 on the C factor was not specific to this sample as the same has been seen previously (Kallasmaa et al., 2000).”
• Social desirability and consensual validity of personality traits (2006, methodology): “The Big-Five dimensions were measured with Estonian version ( Kallasmaa, Allik, Realo, & McCrae, 2000 ) of the NEO-PI-R (Costa & McCrae, 1992) consisting of 240 items forming 30 facet scales and 5 domain scales (Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness to Experience, Agreeableness and Conscientiousness).”