Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua

By Martina Faller. 2002

445 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f00c1e5d5d9cc1339c272b29bd28fbf8e8a4f6ba

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

On the exceptional status of reportative evidentials (2014, background): “• As first shown by Faller (2002), this expectation is not upheld for Reportatives: (3) Cuzco Quechua (Faller, 2002, p. 191) a. Pay-kuna-s (s)he-Pl-Rep ˜ noqa-ma-qa I-Illa-Top qulqi-ta money-Acc muntu-ntin-pi lot-Incl-Loc saqiy-wa-n leave-1O-3 p = 'They leave me a lot of money' Evid = Speaker was to”
Functional convergence in the tense, evidentiality and aspectual systems of Quechua Spanish bilinguals (2004, background): “…“combine reportative interpretations with interpretations as inferences from result states to the causing event and mirative interpretations” (Faller, 2002, p. 30) Indeed, it is the case that in addition to its hearsay meaning, the suffix -sqa in Quechua does have a mirative…”
Evidentiality and interrogativity (2017, background): “…ordering on an evidential hierarchy is something like participation > vision > other sensory experience > inference/report (see Barnes, 1984; Faller, 2002b; Oswalt, 1986 for examples and discussion).11 s about the cultural value that may be attached to different kinds of evidence nor to…”
Evidentials as Generalized Functional Heads (2010, background): “See also Faller (2001) and Willett (1988). Moreover, the fact that the same basic”
Evidentials as epistemic modals: Evidence from St'át'imcets (2008, methodology): “2 An illocutionary operator analysis of evidentials A contrasting analysis of evidentials is provided by Faller (2002) on the basis of data from Cuzco Quechua.”
Must . . . stay . . . strong! (2010, background): “This is not the place for us to survey the field of evidentiality studies in any amount of detail (some relevant references are Aikhenvald 2004; Davis, Potts & Speas 2007; Faller 2002; de Haan 2001; Matthewson, Rullmann & Davis 2007; McCready & Ogata 2007; Rooryck 2001a,b; Willett 1988).”
Modals as distributive indefinites (2008, background): “Situations similar to (84) are discussed by Faller (2002) as being test cases for the quantificational force of a reportative modal.”
Predicting the presuppositions of soft triggers (2011, background): “7.2 Challenges?”
A semantic account of mirative evidentials (2013, background): “' Evidentials in Cheyenne participate in a phenomenon called 'interrogative flip' (Faller 2002, among others).”
Embedding epistemic modals in English: A corpus-based study (2012, background): “Evidentials are often said not to contribute to the truth-conditional content of the sentence they combine with, but rather to indicate the speaker’s grounds, or source of evidence, for expressing that sentence, e.g., sensory, hearsay or inferential evidence (cf. Faller 2002, Aikhenvald 2004).”