Systems Pharmacology: Network Analysis to Identify Multiscale Mechanisms of Drug Action

By Shan Zhao, Ravi Iyengar. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, 2012

334 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Systems approaches have long been used in pharmacology to understand drug action at the organ and organismal levels. The application of computational and experimental systems biology approaches to pharmacology allows us to expand the definition of systems pharmacology to include network analyses at multiple scales of biological organization and to explain both therapeutic and adverse effects of drugs. Systems pharmacology analyses rely on experimental “omics” technologies that are capable of measuring changes in large numbers of variables, often at a genome-wide level, to build networks for analyzing drug action. A major use of omics technologies is to relate the genomic status of an individual to the therapeutic efficacy of a drug of interest. Combining pathway and network analyses, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models, and a knowledge of polymorphisms in the genome will enable the development of predictive models of therapeutic efficacy. Network analyses based on publicly available databases such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Adverse Event Reporting System allow us to develop an initial understanding of the context within which molecular-level drug-target interactions can lead to distal effectors in a process that results in adverse phenotypes at the organ and organismal levels. The current state of systems pharmacology allows us to formulate a set of questions that could drive future research in the field. The long-term goal of such research is to develop polypharmacology for complex diseases and predict therapeutic efficacy and adverse event risk for individuals prior to commencement of therapy.

Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eff87d5850df2c45dab80bb553ce9e3f2d562ade

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Theory and Mathematics

  1. Ruth Nussinov
  2. Peter Csermely
  3. Zi‐Yi Wang
  4. Jiahui Zheng
  5. Xin Wang
  6. Huba J. M. Kiss
  7. Tamás Korcsmáros
  8. Shao Li

In Molecular Biology

  1. Ruth Nussinov
  2. Peter Csermely
  3. Zi‐Yi Wang
  4. Yuzong Chen
  5. Jiahui Zheng
  6. Xin Wang
  7. Huba J. M. Kiss
  8. Tamás Korcsmáros

In Pharmacology

  1. Ruth Nussinov
  2. Peter Csermely
  3. Zi‐Yi Wang
  4. Jiahui Zheng
  5. Xin Wang
  6. Huba J. M. Kiss
  7. Tamás Korcsmáros
  8. Shao Li

Citations in the corpus