Trapped-ion quantum computing: Progress and challenges

By C. Bruzewicz, J. Chiaverini, R. McConnell, J. Sage. Applied Physics Reviews, 2019

1,431 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Trapped ions are among the most promising systems for practical quantum computing (QC). The basic requirements for universal QC have all been demonstrated with ions, and quantum algorithms using few-ion-qubit systems have been implemented. We review the state of the field, covering the basics of how trapped ions are used for QC and their strengths and limitations as qubits. In addition, we discuss what is being done, and what may be required, to increase the scale of trapped ion quantum computers while mitigating decoherence and control errors. Finally, we explore the outlook for trapped-ion QC. In particular, we discuss near-term applications, considerations impacting the design of future systems of trapped ions, and experiments and demonstrations that may further inform these considerations.Trapped ions are among the most promising systems for practical quantum computing (QC). The basic requirements for universal QC have all been demonstrated with ions, and quantum algorithms using few-ion-qubit systems have been implemented. We review the state of the field, covering the basics of how trapped ions are used for QC and their strengths and limitations as qubits. In addition, we discuss what is being done, and what may be required, to increase the scale of trapped ion quantum computers while mitigating decoherence and control errors. Finally, we explore the outlook for trapped-ion QC. In particular, we discuss near-term applications, considerations impacting the design of future systems of trapped ions, and experiments and demonstrations that may further inform these considerations.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eff6546819d25df0bccdc89f02554a43a4f1c464

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Shannon Whitlock
  2. M. Morgado
  3. Ali Javadi-Abhari
  4. Lev S. Bishop
  5. Andrew W. Cross
  6. Jay M. Gambetta
  7. Mehul Malik
  8. Terry Rudolph

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. Ali Javadi-Abhari
  2. Lev S. Bishop
  3. Shannon Whitlock
  4. M. Morgado
  5. Mehul Malik
  6. Andrew W. Cross
  7. Lixing You
  8. Terry Rudolph

Citations in the corpus